PS

Press Statement No. 3-2022 (OCC) _CC Emphasized that Unilateral Conversion Contravenes Article 12(4) of the FC

PRESS STATEMENT

KUALA LUMPUR (21 FEBRUARY 2022)   –   The Children’s Commissioner of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM), Prof Dato’ Noor Aziah Mohd Awal (CC) commends the Kuala Lumpur High Court decision today in allowing the habeas corpus application by a mother who has been separated from her three (3) children by the father since 2019. The Court further ordered that the three (3) children who are now under the care of the Social Welfare Department be released forthwith to the sole custody, care, and control of the mother. Earlier, it was alleged that the children were unilaterally converted to Islam by the Perlis religious authorities, at the request of their father in July 2020, and that the mother was unaware of the conversion as she was recovering in a domestic abuse shelter. The mother has been unable to gain control of her children although the Court in December 2019 and March 2021, had given the mother full custody.

The CC wishes to highlight that the separation of a child from his or her parents violates Article 9 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and this right must be respected and taken into consideration in the assessment of the child’s best interests.

In relation to the unilateral conversion, the CC reiterates the Federal Court’s decision in the case of Indira Gandhi in 2018 that as far as children are concerned, conversion to another religion must be done with consent of both parents as provided by Article 12(4) of the Federal Constitution (FC). The word “parent” in Article 12(4) of the FC has been interpreted to include “both parents” and the Guardianship of Infants Act 1961 [Act 351] by virtue of Section 5 recognises that both parents have equal rights in respect of the child. Section 5(2) of Act 351 further provides that “the mother of an infant shall have the like powers of applying to the Court in respect of any matter affecting the infant as are possessed by the father”. Thus, the consent of both parents is necessary in determining the religion of the child. It must be emphasized that unilateral conversion contravenes Article 12(4) of the FC.

The children have been denied the right to live with their mother for the past three (3) years and therefore, the CC appeals to all parties concerned to abide by the Court’s decision and allow the children to be reunited with their mother.

-END-

Professor Dato’ Noor Aziah Hj. Mohd Awal, Children’s Commissioner

21 February 2022

Media queries: Contact Mrs. Norashikin Hamzah at 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 or shikin@suhakam.org.my

KENYATAAN MEDIA

KUALA LUMPUR (21 FEBRUARI 2022)   –   Pesuruhjaya Kanak-Kanak Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM), Prof Dato’ Noor Aziah Mohd Awal (CC) memuji keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur hari ini yang membenarkan permohonan habeas corpus seorang ibu yang telah dipisahkan daripada tiga (3) orang anaknya oleh bapa mereka sejak 2019. Mahkamah turut memerintahkan agar ketiga-tiga kanak-kanak tersebut, yang kini dalam jagaan Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat dilepaskan kepada penjagaan mutlak, perlindungan dan kawalan oleh ibu mereka. Kanak-kanak tersebut sebelum ini didakwa telah diislamkan secara sepihak oleh pihak berkuasa agama Perlis, atas permintaan bapa mereka pada Julai 2020, dan ibu mereka tidak mengetahui tentang pertukaran agama tersebut kerana beliau sedang dalam proses pemulihan di sebuah rumah perlindungan keganasan rumah tangga. Beliau gagal mendapatkan penjagaan anak-anaknya walaupun telah mendapat perintah hak jagaan penuh Mahkamah pada Disember 2019.

CC ingin menekankan bahawa pemisahan seorang kanak-kanak daripada ibu bapanya adalah menyalahi Perkara 9 Konvensyen Mengenai Kanak-kanak (CRC) dan hak ini hendaklah dihormati serta dipertimbangkan dalam penilaian berkaitan kepentingan terbaik kanak-kanak.

Berhubung isu pertukaran agama secara sepihak, CC ingin menekankan keputusan Mahkamah Persekutuan dalam kes Indira Gandhi pada tahun 2018 bahawa apabila ia melibatkan kanak-kanak, penukaran kepada agama lain hendaklah dibuat dengan persetujuan kedua ibu bapa seperti yang termaktub dalam Perkara 12(4) Perlembagaan Persekutuan (PP). Perkataan “ibu bapa” dalam Perkara 12(4) PP telah ditafsirkan untuk turut menyertakan “kedua ibu bapa”, dan Akta Penjagaan Kanak-kanak 1961 [Akta 351] merujuk kepada Seksyen 5 telah mengiktiraf dengan lebih lanjut bahawa “ibu kepada kanak-kanak hendaklah mempunyai kuasa yang sama dalam memohon kepada Mahkamah berhubung apa-apa perkara yang memberi kesan kepada kanak-kanak sepertimana kuasa yang dimiliki bapa”. Oleh itu, persetujuan kedua ibu bapa adalah perlu dalam menentukan agama anak. Adalah ditegaskan bahawa pertukaran agama secara sepihak adalah bertentangan dengan Perkara 12(4) PP.

Kanak-kanak tersebut telah dinafikan hak untuk hidup bersama ibu mereka selama tiga (3) tahun. Oleh yang demikian, CC memohon agar semua pihak yang terlibat untuk mematuhi keputusan Mahkamah, dan membenarkan kanak-kanak tersebut disatukan semula dengan ibu mereka.

-TAMAT-

Professor Dato’ Noor Aziah Hj. Mohd Awal, Pesuruhjaya Kanak-Kanak

21 Februari 2022

Pertanyaan Media: Sila hubungi Pn. Norashikin Hamzah melalui 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 atau shikin@suhakam.org.my

PS

Press Statement No. 2-2022_SUHAKAM is Concerned with the Longstanding Forced Labour Issue in Malaysia

PRESS STATEMENT

KUALA LUMPUR (19 FEBRUARY 2022)   –   The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) is concerned with the longstanding forced labour issue in Malaysia that has been widely reported in local and foreign media. Forced labour is a serious human rights violation and infringes the legal guarantee provided by Article 6 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia which prohibits all forms of slavery and forced labour. In addition, such practises contravene the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 (ATIPSOM) that criminalises forced labour which is a form of exploitation of human beings. The issuance of numerous Withhold Release Orders (WRO) by the United States Customs and Border Protection (CBD) to Malaysian companies over alleged forced labour practices signal the urgent need for Malaysia to immediately put in place effective measures to circumvent and remedy forced labour practices that is occurring in Malaysia or involving Malaysian companies.

SUHAKAM commends the launching of Malaysia’s first-ever National Action Plan on Forced Labour (NAPFL) 2021-2025 in 2021 to address and eradicate compulsory labour. The standards set forth by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention 1930 that Malaysia has agreed to ratify, should anchor the NAPFL. In addition, SUHAKAM urges for tangible outcomes including in law reform and effective remedy to be in place the earliest possible. SUHAKAM looks forward for the NAPFL to critically address, among others, more stringent requirements for companies to implement effective due diligence procedures and grievance mechanisms, particularly in their employment practices. Notwithstanding the legal provisions to be enforced by the Government, private companies have a responsibility to comply with national labour laws and international labour standards to ensure human rights compliance throughout their entire supply chain framework and must immediately take the lead in demonstrating that they can stand up to comply with the international human rights and labour standards. These should address the various sectors including the medical supplies industry, agricultural (including plantations), construction and manufacturing sectors.

SUHAKAM reiterates its call on the Government to ensure transparency by making public the full report of the Special Independent Committee on Foreign Worker Management. Notwithstanding this, SUHAKAM urges the Government to expedite the implementation of the Committee’s recommendations which considered issues of unethical, unhealthy, and unfair practices in the recruitment of foreign workers including the need to make workers recruitment transparent by introducing an end-to-end online system for hiring foreign workers. For long term measures to be successful, the Government is encouraged to have more meaningful consultations with the relevant stakeholders including NGOs.

SUHAKAM further calls on the Government to expedite the development of Malaysia’s National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (NAPBHR) which will establish responsibility on the part of business entities to respect human rights that not only deals with labour issues but also impresses on the accountability of business practices to people and planet. The NAPBHR should be strictly guided by the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

19 February 2022

Media queries: Contact Mrs. Norashikin Hamzah at 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 or shikin@suhakam.org.my

KENYATAAN MEDIA

KUALA LUMPUR (19 FEBRUARI 2022)  –  Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM) menzahirkan kebimbangan terhadap isu berpanjangan buruh paksa di Malaysia yang mendapat laporan meluas media tempatan dan luar negara. Buruh paksa adalah pencabulan hak asasi manusia yang serius dan melanggar jaminan peruntukan di bawah Perkara 6 Perlembagaan Persekutuan Malaysia yang melarang segala bentuk perhambaan dan kerja paksa. Amalan sebegini juga bercanggah dengan Akta Antipemerdagangan Orang dan Antipenyeludupan Migran 2007 (ATIPSOM) yang menjenayahkan kerja paksa sebagai satu bentuk eksploitasi terhadap manusia. Pengeluaran beberapa Perintah Sekatan Pelepasan (WRO) oleh Jabatan Kastam dan Perlindungan Sempadan (CBP) Amerika Syarikat kepada syarikat Malaysia berhubung dakwaan amalan buruh paksa menunjukkan bahawa Malaysia perlu segera melaksanakan langkah efektif untuk segera membasmi dan menangani amalan buruh paksa yang sedang berlaku di Malaysia atau yang melibatkan syarikat Malaysia.

SUHAKAM menyambut baik pelancaran Pelan Tindakan Kebangsaan mengenai Buruh Paksa (NAPFL) 2021-2025 yang pertama di Malaysia pada 2021 untuk menangani dan membasmi buruh paksa. Standard yang ditetapkan oleh Protokol Pertubuhan Buruh Antarabangsa (ILO) 2014 kepada Konvensyen Buruh Paksa 1930 yang akan diratifikasi oleh Malaysia, harus menjadi kayu ukur NAPFL. Di samping itu, SUHAKAM menggesa untuk natijah yang lebih nyata dicapai dengan segera, termasuk pembaharuan undang-undang dan remedi. SUHAKAM berharap agar NAPFL kritis menangani, antaranya, keperluan yang lebih ketat bagi syarikat untuk melaksanakan usaha wajar yang efektif dan mekanisma aduan, khususnya dalam amalan pekerjaan mereka. Walau apa jua peruntukan undang-undang yang akan dikuatkuasakan oleh Kerajaan, syarikat swasta mempunyai tanggungjawab untuk mematuhi undang-undang buruh kebangsaan dan standard buruh antarabangsa bagi memastikan pematuhan hak asasi manusia di seluruh rangka kerja rantaian bekalan mereka dan perlu segera menjadi contoh terbaik dalam pematuhan standard hak asasi manusia dan buruh antarabangsa. Ini juga bagi menangani pelbagai sektor termasuk industri bekalan perubatan, pertanian (termasuk perladangan), pembinaan dan sektor pembuatan.

SUHAKAM mengulangi seruan kepada Kerajaan untuk memastikan ketelusan dengan mengumumkan laporan penuh Jawatankuasa Bebas Khas Pengurusan Pekerja Asing. Kerajaan perlu mempercepatkan pelaksanaan saranan Jawatankuasa yang mengambil kira isu amalan tidak beretika, tidak sihat dan tidak adil dalam pengambilan pekerja asing termasuk keperluan untuk pengambilan pekerja asing dijalankan telus dengan memperkenalkan sistem dalam talian sepenuhnya. Bagi memastikan langkah-langkah jangka panjang ini berjaya dilaksanakan, Kerajaan digalakkan untuk mengadakan perundingan yang lebih bermakna dengan pihak berkepentingan termasuk NGO.

SUHAKAM menggesa Kerajaan untuk mempercepatkan pembangunan Pelan Tindakan Kebangsaan Malaysia Mengenai Perniagaan dan Hak Asasi Manusia (NAPBHR) yang akan meletakkan tanggungjawab ke atas entiti perniagaan untuk menghormati hak asasi manusia yang bukan hanya untuk menangani isu buruh tetapi juga menekankan akauntabiliti amalan perniagaan kepada manusia dan alam. NAPBHR harus teguh berpandukan Prinsip Panduan PBB mengenai Perniagaan dan Hak Asasi Manusia (UNGP).

-TAMAT-

Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

19 Februari 2022

Pertanyaan Media: Sila hubungi Pn. Norashikin Hamzah melalui 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 atau shikin@suhakam.org.my

PS

Press Statement No. 2-2022 (OCC) _The Case of a 15 Year-old Girl Stabbing Her Own Newborn Baby

PRESS STATEMENT

KUALA LUMPUR (13 FEBRUARY 2022)   –   The Children’s Commissioner of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM), Prof Dato’ Noor Aziah Mohd Awal (CC) is saddened by the case of a 15-year-old girl stabbing her own newborn baby in Cukai, Kemaman. It is understood that the girl was a rape victim, and her family was unaware that she was pregnant, as she has been missing from home. The girl has dropped out from school soon after the MCO was implemented due to lack of access to online learning.

The Office of the Children’s Commissioner (OCC) was informed that the girl is now under police custody and currently being detained in a police lock-up. While the CC is aware that the case is being investigated, detaining a 15-year-old girl who had just given birth is clearly not in the best interest of the child. The CC if of the view that the approach taken in dealing with a child who is in conflict with the law should be in line with the Convention on the Right of the Child (CRC) to which Malaysia is a Party. The CC believes that the girl is definitely suffering from a horrible mental health condition that led her to act in such a way.

The CC stresses that:

  1. It is paramount that the girl must first be given proper postpartum treatment including psychological treatment before taking her through the prosecution process. The Social Welfare Department (SWD) should ensure that both treatments are given appropriately to the girl;
  2. The girl should be given the necessary legal aid, in particular, the right to a legal representative (lawyer) as well as a Social Welfare Officer who would act as her probation officer and protector. The SWD is urged to arrange for the legal aid to be provided to the girl on a pro bono basis;
  3. The children in conflict with the law must be treated in accordance with the provisions under the Child Act 2001 (Act 611) and the CRC. By virtue of Section 83A of Act 611, a child being arrested should not be handcuffed, and the parents or guardian must be informed of the child’s whereabouts. Under the same Act and the CRC, the child’s identity should be protected and not be disclosed. Furthermore, the child’s right to consult a counsel of his or her choice should be fulfilled. In addition, children in detention should not be placed with an adult who has been charged with an offence.

The CC is concerned with the statement issued by the Deputy Minister of MWFCD through social media, which has since been deleted that the girl did not suffer from any mental health conditions and the CC believes that a comprehensive psychological assessment on the mental health of the girl should be conducted before such statement is issued. In this instance, the CC also wishes to reiterate that the child/ girl is a rape victim, irrespective of consent and this is a statutory rape case under the Section 375 of the Penal Code. The CC emphasizes that the principle of the best interest of the child, as envisioned in Article 3 of the CRC, should be applied in all criminal cases involving children.

This incident has again highlighted the importance of a comprehensive syllabus of sex, sexuality, and reproductive education which must be developed by the Ministry of Education (MoE) with cooperation and collaboration with the Ministry of Health (MoH) and the Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development (MWFCD). This syllabus should be taught to all children in all government and private schools. More effective collaboration and coordination should be fostered among relevant Government agencies such as MoE, Ministry of Communication and Multimedia (MCM) and MFWCD to intensify efforts in promoting greater awareness among children regarding such education through various medium, including social media.

The CC also urges the Government to implement effective program in providing emotional support to all pregnant teenagers/girls in a safe environment. The MWFCD must publicize services provided by SWD so that families of pregnant teenagers/girls will be more prepared to address the situation.

-END-

Professor Dato’ Noor Aziah Hj. Mohd Awal, Children’s Commissioner

13 February 2022

Media queries: Contact Mrs. Norashikin Hamzah at 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 or shikin@suhakam.org.my

KENYATAAN MEDIA

KUALA LUMPUR (13 FEBRUARI 2022)   –   Pesuruhjaya Kanak-Kanak Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM), Prof Dato’ Noor Aziah Mohd Awal (CC) berasa dukacita berhubung kes seorang kanak-kanak perempuan berumur 15 tahun yang menikam bayi lelakinya yang baru dilahirkan di Cukai, Kemaman. Difahamkan bahawa kanak-kanak itu merupakan mangsa rogol dan keluarganya tidak mengetahui bahawa kanak-kanak itu hamil kerana dia sudah lama tidak pulang ke rumah. Kanak-kanak itu telah berhenti sekolah tidak lama selepas Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan (PKP) dilaksanakan akibat tidak mempunyai akses kepada pembelajaran dalam talian.

Pejabat Pesuruhjaya Kanak-kanak (OCC) dimaklumkan bahawa kanak-kanak itu berada dalam tahanan polis dan kini sedang ditahan di lokap. Walaupun CC maklum bahawa kes sedang dalam siasatan, menahan kanak-kanak perempuan berumur 15 tahun tersebut yang baru sahaja melahirkan bayi amat jelas bukan cara terbaik dalam menjaga kepentingan terbaik kanak-kanak. CC berpandangan bahawa pendekatan yang diambil dalam mengendalikan kanak-kanak yang berkonflik dengan undang-undang hendaklah selaras dengan Konvensyen Mengenai Hak Kanak-Kanak (CRC) yang mana Malaysia merupakan negara pihak CRC. CC percaya bahawa kanak-kanak itu telah mengalami kondisi kesihatan mental yang teruk sehingga membawanya bertindak sedemikian rupa.

CC menekankan bahawa:

  1. Amat penting untuk kanak-kanak itu terlebih dahulu diberi rawatan selepas melahirkan termasuk rawatan psikologi sebelum proses pendakwaan dijalankan. Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat (JKM) perlu memastikan kanak-kanak itu diberi kedua-dua rawatan tersebut dengan sewajarnya;
  2. Kanak-kanak itu perlu diberi bantuan guaman, terutamanya hak kepada peguam dan juga Pegawai Kebajikan Masyarakat yang akan berperanan sebagai pegawai pelindung. Pihak JKM digesa untuk mengaturkan agar bantuan guaman dapat diberikan kepada kanak-kanak secara pro bono;
  3. Urusan bagi kanak-kanak yang berkonflik dengan undang-undang harus dikendalikan selaras dengan peruntukan dalam Akta Kanak-kanak 2001 (Akta 611) dan CRC. Berdasarkan Seksyen 83A Akta 611, kanak-kanak yang ditahan tidak boleh digari, dan ibu bapa atau penjaga kanak-kanak hendaklah dimaklumkan berhubung keberadaan kanak-kanak tersebut. Di bawah Akta yang sama dan CRC, identiti kanak-kanak perlu dilindungi dan tidak boleh didedahkan. Hak kanak-kanak untuk berunding dengan peguam pilihannya harus dipenuhi. Selain itu, kanak-kanak dalam tahanan tidak boleh bergaul bersama tahanan dewasa yang telah didakwa dengan sesuatu kesalahan.

CC khuatir dengan kenyataan yang dikeluarkan Timbalan Menteri Kementerian Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat (KPWKM) melalui sosial media, yang mana ia telahpun dipadam, bahawa kanak-kanak itu tidak mengalami sebarang masalah kesihatan mental. CC percaya penilaian psikologi yang menyeluruh terhadap kesihatan mental kanak-kanak itu perlu dilakukan sebelum kenyataan sedemikian dibuat. Dalam hal ini, CC ingin menegaskan bahawa kanak-kanak perempuan tersebut adalah mangsa rogol, tidak kira sama ada secara sukarela dan ia adalah kes rogol statutori di bawah Seksyen 375 Kanun Keseksaan. CC menekankan bahawa prinsip kepentingan terbaik kanak-kanak, seperti yang diperuntukkan dalam Perkara 3 CRC, hendaklah diaplikasikan dalam semua kes jenayah yang melibatkan kanak-kanak.

Insiden ini sekali lagi menjelaskan bahawa pentingnya silibus pendidikan kesihatan seks, seksualiti dan reproduktif yang komprehensif diwujudkan oleh Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) dengan kerjasama dan kolaborasi bersama Kementerian Kesihatan (KKM) dan KPWKM. Silibus ini hendaklah diajar kepada semua kanak-kanak di semua sekolah kerajaan atau swasta. Kerjasama dan koordinasi yang lebih efektif haruslah dipupuk dalam kalangan agensi Kerajaan yang berkaitan seperti KKM, Kementerian Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia (KKMM) dan KPWKM bagi mempergiatkan usaha untuk meningkatkan kesedaran kanak-kanak mengenai pendidikan tersebut melalui pelbagai medium, termasuk media sosial.

CC juga menggesa Kerajaan untuk melaksanakan program yang lebih efektif dalam memberikan sokongan emosi kepada semua remaja/kanak-kanak perempuan yang hamil, dalam persekitaran yang selamat. KPWKM perlu lebih menyebar luas perkhidmatan yang disediakan oleh JKM agar keluarga kepada remaja/kanak-kanak perempuan yang hamil lebih bersedia dalam menangani situasi ini.

-TAMAT-

Professor Dato’ Noor Aziah Hj. Mohd Awal, Pesuruhjaya Kanak-Kanak

13 Februari 2022

Pertanyaan Media: Sila hubungi Pn. Norashikin Hamzah melalui 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 atau shikin@suhakam.org.my

TENDER

Sebut Harga Bagi Perkhidmatan Mereka Bentuk, Mencetak Dan Membekal Laporan Tahunan 2021 Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM) Dalam Bahasa Malaysia dan Bahasa Inggeris

NO. SEBUT HARGA : SHM.001/1/18 Jilid 5 ( 1 )

TAJUK SEBUT HARGA : Sebut Harga Bagi Perkhidmatan Mereka Bentuk, Mencetak Dan Membekal Laporan Tahunan 2021 Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM) Dalam Bahasa Malaysia dan Bahasa Inggeris

TARIKH IKLAN : 28 Januari 2022
TARIKH KEMUKAKAN SEBUT HARGA : 11 Februari 2022 (sebelum 12.00 tengah hari)

JUMLAH CETAKAN :
i) Bahasa Malaysia : 1000 naskah
ii) Bahasa Inggeris : 1000 naskah

PS

Press Statement No. 1-2022: SUHAKAM Calls for the Government to Immediately Review and Reform all Laws and Policies on Citizenship

PRESS STATEMENT

KUALA LUMPUR (20 JANUARY 2022)   –   The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) is concerned on the case of Rohana Abdullah, a stateless woman raised by a Malaysian who has been struggling with her citizenship issue after reportedly being abandoned by her biological Indonesian mother and Malaysian father when she was two months old. Abandoned children always suffer from discrimination and were denied basic rights such as access to education and medical care.

SUHAKAM commends the Prime Minister’s gesture to assist Rohana and welcomes the Home Minister’s move to investigate this matter, but hopes that the Ministry of Home Affairs will not only focus on citizenship applications on a case by case basis but instead, take a holistic approach to address all citizenship issues involving stateless persons in Malaysia. Stateless persons have been struggling with the denial of fundamental human rights and dignity and it is incumbent upon the State to find an immediate resolution to bridge this gap, in respect of the rights of the children. Currently, children separated from their biological parents and born out of wedlock are mostly affected by the citizenship law in Malaysia. While Malaysia’s provisions relating to citizenship adhere to the principle of jus sanguinis, they are strictly conditioned on proof of the legality of marriage of biological parents and place of birth of the child.

Article 8(2) of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) obliges Malaysia to re-establish speedily, a child’s identity in the event they were illegally deprived of some or all the elements of his or her identity. In addition, SUHAKAM has consistently advised the Government to withdraw its reservation on the right to nationality under Article 7(1) of the CRC and ratify the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which contains the same guarantee under Article 24(2). The Federal Constitution (FC) of Malaysia contains a strong legal safeguard against statelessness as provided in the Second Schedule of the FC which states that “every person born within the Federation who is not a citizen of any other country is a citizen of Malaysia by operation of law”. The Federal Court landmark case of CCH & Anor v Pendaftar Besar Bagi Kelahiran Dan Kematian Malaysia (2021) clarifies that ‘citizenship by operation of law’ is a fundamental and constitutional right. In addition, section 19B of Part III of the Second Schedule of the FC clearly provides that every person born in Malaysia who is not proven to be a citizen of any other country and who does not acquire any other citizenship is a citizen of Malaysia by operation of the law. In cases like this, the documentation required by the National Department of Registration (NRD) must be reasonable and in line with the provisions of the FC as stateless persons are generally lack of any proper and formal form of identification.

Stateless communities in Malaysia are unable to enjoy their inherent rights such as education, health care, employment, social security, freedom of movement and many others, which could also lead to serious social problems. If not addressed, the cycle of statelessness will also be endless for their future generations. Therefore, in addressing this long-standing issue, SUHAKAM calls for the Government to immediately review and reform all laws and policies on citizenship and to adopt more transparent procedures in facilitating the application of citizenship to reduce and prevent statelessness in the country.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

20 January 2022

Media queries: Contact Mrs. Norashikin Hamzah at 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 or shikin@suhakam.org.my


KENYATAAN MEDIA

KUALA LUMPUR (20 JANUARY 2022)  –  Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM) prihatin dengan kes Rohana Abdullah, wanita tak bernegara yang dibesarkan oleh warganegara Malaysia dan dilaporkan telah ditinggalkan oleh ibu kandung warganegara Indonesia dan bapa kandung warganegara Malaysia sejak berusia dua bulan. Kanak-kanak yang ditinggalkan begini sering didiskriminasi dan dinafikan hak asasi seperti akses kepada pendidikan dan penjagaan kesihatan.

SUHAKAM memuji niat Perdana Menteri menawarkan bantuan kepada Rohana dan menyambut baik tindakan Menteri Dalam Negeri untuk menyiasat isu ini namun berharap agar Kementerian Dalam Negeri tidak hanya memberikan tumpuan kepada kes-kes tertentu sebaliknya mengambil pendekatan menyeluruh untuk menangani semua isu yang melibatkan orang tak bernegara di Malaysia. Hak asasi dan maruah diri mereka dinafikan dan adalah menjadi kewajipan negara untuk mencari penyelesaian segera bagi merapatkan jurang ini demi kepentingan hak kanak-kanak. Pada masa ini, kanak-kanak yang terpisah daripada ibubapa kandung dan dilahirkan luar nikah adalah yang paling terjejas dengan undang-undang kewargannegaraan di Malaysia. Meskipun peruntukan berhubung kewarganegaraan di Malaysia mematuhi prinsip jus sanguinis, kewarganegaraan ditentukan oleh bukti status perkahwinan yang sah ibu dan bapa kandung serta tempat kelahiran kanak-kanak tersebut.

Di bawah Perkara 8(2) Konvensyen mengenai hak Kanak-kanak PBB (CRC) Malaysia harus mengembalikan segera identiti seorang kanak-kanak sekiranya sebahagian atau kesemua elemen identiti mereka dilucutkan secara tidak sah. SUHAKAM konsisten menasihati Kerajaan menamatkan reservasi kepada hak kerakyatan di bawah Perkara 7(1) CRC dan meratifikasi Konvensyen Antarabangsa Hak Sivil dan Politik (ICCPR) yang mengandungi jaminan yang sama di bawah Perkara 24(2). Perlembagaan Persekutuan (PP) Malaysia mengandungi perlindungan yang kukuh terhadap ketiadaan kewarganegaraan dalam Jadual Kedua Perlembagaan Persekutuan yang memperuntukkan bahawa “tiap-tiap orang yang lahir di Persekutuan dan pada masa dia lahir tidak menjadi warganegara mana-mana negara ialah warganegara Malaysia melalui kuat kuasa undang-undang”. Kes Mahkamah Persekutuan CCH & Anor v Pendaftar Besar Bagi Kelahiran Dan Kematian Malaysia (2021) menjelaskan bahawa ‘kewarganegaraan melalui kuasa undang-undang’ merupakan hak asasi dan hak perlembagaan. Malah Seksyen 19B Bahagian III Jadual Kedua Perlembagaan Persekutuan jelas memperuntukkan bahawa tiap-tiap orang yang lahir di Malaysia dan tiada bukti menjadi warganegara mana-mana negara ialah warganegara Malaysia melalui kuat kuasa undang-undang.

Komuniti tak bernegara di Malaysia tidak dapat menikmati hak asasi seperti pendidikan, penjagaan kesihatan, pekerjaan, keselamatan sosial, kebebasan bergerak dan banyak lagi yang boleh menjurus kepada masalah sosial yang lebih serius. Jika tidak ditangani, kitaran tak bernegara akan terus berpanjangan sehingga generasi mereka yang akan datang. Sehubungan itu, bagi menangani isu yang telah wujud sekian lama ini, SUHAKAM menyeru Kerajaan segera mengkaji semula dan memperbaharui semua undang-undang dan dasar mengenai kewarganegaraan dan mengamalkan prosedur yang lebih telus untuk memudahkan permohonan kewarganegaraan seterusnya mengurangkan serta mengekang isu orang tak bernegara di negara ini.

-TAMAT-

Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

20 January 2022

Pertanyaan Media: Sila hubungi Pn. Norashikin Hamzah melalui 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 atau shikin@suhakam.org.my

SuhakamLogo-2048x1463

TOWARDS THE REALISATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOR ALL

14 JAN 2022

The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) is an independent Commission, established by the Malaysian Parliament under the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act 1999 (Act 597), for the promotion and protection of human rights in Malaysia. Section 2 of Act 597 defines “human rights” as the fundamental liberties enshrined in Part II of the Federal Constitution. Additionally, the Act 597 authorises SUHAKAM to give regard the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in undertaking its functions, so long as it is not inconsistent with the Federal Constitution of Malaysia. Towards this, SUHAKAM is mandated by Section 4 (1) of Act 597 to promote awareness of, and provide education in relation to human rights;  to advise and assist the Government in formulating legislation and administrative directives and procedures and recommend the necessary measures to be taken; to recommend to the Government with regard to the subscription or accession of treaties and other international instruments in the field of human rights; and to inquire into complaints regarding infringements of human rights.

In the course of fulfilling its duties for over 20 years, it is apparent to SUHAKAM that its capacity and effectiveness in performing its roles and functions are contingent upon its independence and ability to act conscientiously. SUHAKAM takes great effort to ensure this, not only to meet the requirements as stated in the Paris Principles[1], but more importantly, to maintain its credibility amongst the Malaysian public as an institution that performs its duties impartially and without fear or favour in order to promote and protect human rights in Malaysia. As such, while SUHAKAM takes serious consideration of all views provided by stakeholders from different extremes and of differing aspirations, SUHAKAM’s decisions and stances on human rights are made independently and in line with the parameters given by Act 597. Additionally, guided by Section 7(4) of Act 597, SUHAKAM endeavours, as far possible, to make all decisions by consensus of its members.

In spite of the above, there appears to be continued misunderstanding by certain quarters, about SUHAKAM’s status, roles, and functions. These misconceptions have become more apparent recently based on reactions from certain individuals and groups following SUHAKAM’s bold decision to take up issues that may be seen by some as “controversial” and not in keeping with the Malaysian social context. Some have even alleged that SUHAKAM only champions perverse issues while ignoring core human rights issues that affect the lives of grassroot communities.

In light of these, and consistent with SUHAKAM’s motto “Human Rights for All”, SUHAKAM wishes to correct some of the misconceptions about SUHAKAM and its way of work towards the promotion and protection of human rights in Malaysia:

“SUHAKAM is western-centric”

Undeniably, SUHAKAM has had its fair share of criticisms from different stakeholders in the country due to their differing perceptions and expectations of SUHAKAM. Some still hold on to the view that SUHAKAM has not lived up to their expectations while others continue to see SUHAKAM as being ‘pro-NGO’ or an institution that blindly follows western concepts due to its many statements and stances that were critical of the authorities or seen as challenging cultural relativism.

In reality, SUHAKAM’s positions take into consideration the local contexts and are not made in silo.

Since the very beginning of its inception, SUHAKAM has built in its way of work, platforms for stakeholders’ consultations on which, individuals and groups with interest are invited to provide their concerns and views on arising human rights issues as well as expectations of changes that need to be made in the country to ensure meaningful human rights progress. In conducting these consultations, SUHAKAM goes to great lengths to ensure that local individuals and groups, including CSOs of diverse backgrounds are engaged, aside from its regional and international partners. Some of the key stakeholders engaged by SUHAKAM include religious groups, women, children, indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities and many more. One example is the current initiative by SUHAKAM to improve the conditions of places of detention in Malaysia to ensure that such places meet, among others, the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. Aside from persons in custody, SUHAKAM made sure that it consulted the relevant Ministries, agencies and officers involved from the start of the initiative. As a result, SUHAKAM’s recommendations to the Government on this matter include not only improvements that could better protect the rights of persons in custody, but also the rights of officers to have safe, clean and healthy working environment.

Another example is SUHAKAM’s promotion work to combat torture. SUHAKAM initiated the formation, and is currently part of a coalition known as the ACT4CAT Coalition[2]. Other than SUHAKAM, members of the Coalition include the Bar Council, Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM), Amnesty International (AI), Lawyers for Liberty (LFL), Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network (ADPAN). Members of the coalition works together to advocate for Malaysia’s ratification of the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UNCAT)[3]. The Coalition actively seeks other CSOs to join the initiative including faith-based organisations.  In 2019, SUHAKAM hosted a regional dialogue on UNCAT which aimed to explore best practices of other States towards the accession and implementation of UNCAT at the domestic level. In getting wider views and perspectives on this issue, SUHAKAM invited local representatives from government agencies, civil society organisations, medical practitioners, NHRIs, academics to the dialogue to ensure the domestic context is considered.

Another example is in 2016, SUHAKAM embarked on a study on discrimination against transgender persons based in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor relating to their rights to employment, healthcare, education, housing and dignity. Discussions were conducted with various groups including faith-based and human rights organisations, as well as individuals who work with them. The report was then published in March 2019 and one of the recommendations is for this community to be able to enjoy full range of human rights without exception and discrimination.

The above are consultation examples on a plethora of human rights issues carried out by SUHAKAM and are made evident in SUHAKAM’s annual reports since year 2000. The consultations conducted by SUHAKAM ensure that local views and contexts form part of the key considerations.

“SUHAKAM disrespects the Federal Constitution”

SUHAKAM abides by its founding legislation, Act 597, in undertaking its functions which includes the promotion and protection of human rights as defined in Part II of the Federal Constitution, as well as guided by the UDHR. Accordingly, SUHAKAM strives to reflect this in all its work.

Be that as it may, Section 4(1)(b) of Act 597 provides that SUHAKAM is also responsible “to advise and assist the Government in formulating legislation and administrative directives and procedures and recommend the necessary measures to be taken”. Based on this provision, SUHAKAM has persistently provided recommendations to the government on improvements to domestic laws to ensure that they attain the universally accepted common standard of achievement for all peoples set forth in the UDHR. Moreover, SUHAKAM has been consulted and invited by various Ministries to be in various law review committees to ensure that the human rights perspective is considered in the formulation and review of laws. Some of them include the Special Project Team on the Anti-Sexual Harassment Bill (2019), Anti-Discrimination against Women Bill, Special Committee on alternatives to mandatory death penalty. SUHAKAM is involved in many other law review committees set up by the Government. 

In this respect, the Government of Malaysia has demonstrated strong commitment to make the necessary changes; for example, the formulation and review of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 (Act 736) and abolition of the Internal Security Act 1960 (Act 82). Even the supreme law of the land, the Federal Constitution of Malaysia was amended in July 2001 to include the term “gender” as a basis for non-discrimination, in line with Malaysia’s international commitment.

SUHAKAM will continue to render its assistance to the government in reforming our domestic laws to reflect the Country’s international human rights commitment, including rights categorised as non-derogable.

“SUHAKAM’s positions contradict religious teachings and the Malaysian culture”

SUHAKAM respects freedom of religion as it itself is a human right. SUHAKAM also respects that Islam is the religion of the Federation, and that other religions may be practised in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation, as provided by Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.

SUHAKAM is disturbed by recent allegations that some of its positions were seen as subtle attacks on certain faith(s). SUHAKAM reiterates that in forming its stances, it is guided by the Federal Constitution of Malaysia as well as the UDHR as allowed by Act 597.

SUHAKAM is of the view that all religions demand for justice, equality and dignity, which also form the cornerstones of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia as well as international human rights standards. On the basis of the supremacy of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, the practice of religion must yield to the fundamental human rights protections afforded by the Constitution. In addition, the Federal Constitution makes clear in Article 75 of Part VI that “‘If any State law is inconsistent with a federal law, the federal law shall prevail and the State law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void.”

“SUHAKAM only champions perverse matters and ignores real grassroot issues”

SUHAKAM underscores that this assumption is unfounded and blatantly false. SUHAKAM has worked on a wide range of human rights issues involving both economic, social, cultural rights as well as civil and political rights themes. In terms of complaints received for instance, between 2017-2021, SUHAKAM received a total of 4,510 complaints from all over Malaysia. Based on the complaints received, SUHAKAM investigated issues such as the right to a standard of living, work, education, health, social security, citizenship, racial discrimination, freedom of movement, expression, assembly, association, religion and many more. SUHAKAM also reaches out to communities through its Meet-the-People Session (SUHAKAM Bersama Masyarakat) to, among others, provide a platform for the local communities to bring to SUHAKAM’s attention existing grassroot human rights issues affecting their lives.

In addressing those thematic issues, and consistent with Article 8(1) and (2) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia, SUHAKAM takes consideration of the lived realities of vulnerable groups and grassroot communities. They include women, children, persons with disabilities, indigenous peoples, refugees, migrants, and many others. Moreover, SUHAKAM upholds the position that all human beings, irrespective of their backgrounds, are born free and equal in worth, dignity and rights.

SUHAKAM’s current Five-Year Strategic Plan 2021-2025 – that is publicly accessible in its website – shows the extensive human rights focus areas being addressed by SUHAKAM including, among others, advancing economic, social and cultural rights especially for vulnerable groups, combating xenophobia, racism and racial discrimination, and enhancing the realisation of children’s rights. This, together with the fact that SUHAKAM’s annual reports – that record the breadth of human rights themes addressed and vulnerable groups engaged by SUHAKAM – debunks this baseless allegation.  

SUHAKAM will continue to address arising human rights issues in Malaysia without fear or favour. This will include addressing human rights matters that may be seen as unpopular by certain quarters. In addition, SUHAKAM will, if the need arises, speak on behalf of any oppressed and vulnerable communities in the country, who may, otherwise, be rendered voiceless due to political and social pressure. In this regard, SUHAKAM also underscores the need for its annual report to be debated by Parliament so that all human rights issues affecting vulnerable groups in Malaysia can be addressed effectively by the Government.

SUHAKAM has consistently adopted independent and fair positions in addressing human rights issues and while its statements are sometimes critical on some policies and actions which are inconsistent with the international human rights principles and norms, SUHAKAM’s positions are always constructive in character and impelled by the need to encourage the country to move forward towards becoming a nation with exemplary human rights standards and performance.


[1] Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions (The Paris Principles) was adopted by General Assembly resolution 48/134 of 20 December 1993 . The Paris Principles set out the minimum standards that NHRIs must meet in aspects of, among others, NHRIs’ legal standing, independence, powers, mandate, and resources to be considered as credible and  effective. In June 2021, SUHAKAM was reaccredited ‘A’ status by the Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA) of the Global Alliance for National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) denoting that SUHAKAM fully complies with the Paris Principles. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/statusofnationalinstitutions.aspx

[2] See more information about the ACT4CAT Coalition and its activities at https://www.facebook.com/ACT4CAT/

[3] The UNCAT which was adopted by the UN General Assembly on 10 December 1984, aims to prevent torture and other acts of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment; https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cat.aspx

PS

Press Statement No. 1-2022 (OCC)_CC Saddened by Setbacks Faced by Children in Accessing School

PRESS STATEMENT

KUALA LUMPUR (13 JANUARY 2022)   –   The Children’s Commissioner (CC), Prof. Dato’ Noor Aziah Mohd Awal is saddened with the recent news report on January 10, 2022, which featured several students from Sekolah Kebangsaan Sibuga Besar in Sandakan crossing a dilapidated suspension bridge on their first day of school.

The report further affirms the CC’s discovery during a recent monitoring visit in Sandakan that children living in deeper remote areas and those without documentation face difficulties in accessing proper mainstream education. The CC commends the action of the Sandakan Town Council and the Implementation Coordination Unit, Prime Minister’s Department, for their coordinated and swift plans to assess the bridge for repair or reconstruction and hopes that such efforts will be expedited further. With the announced closure of the bridge, the CC also hopes that alternative measures, such as the provision of free-of-charge boats, will be implemented to assist children in attending schools. The CC further hopes that the Government, through Public Works Department, will continually inspect and ensure roads and bridges, infrastructure and public facilities under its purview and functions are safe, in good working condition and well-maintained at all times, as such facilities involve public and children’s lives and safety. Assessment and reconstruction efforts should not only be a reactive measure but must be proactive.

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted children’s learning and well-being for almost two years and schools were closed during the enforcement of the Movement Control Order (MCO). With the reopening of schools, the CC implores for all relevant government agencies such as the Department of Education to ensure that all children, especially in rural areas are able to access education, by providing them with the necessary aids including transportation and an enabling school environment which ensures their safety and security.

The right of children to education is internationally recognised under the Article 28(1) of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). Fundamental to this right is the need under Article 28(1)(e) for States to implement measures that encourage regular attendance in school and to decrease drop-out rates. The importance of education is further in emphasised in Goal 4 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which highlights the need for States to ensure equitable education for all.  While Malaysia has continued to maintain its reservation to the Article 28(1)(a) of the CRC on the obligation of States to provide free and compulsory primary education, access to education should nonetheless be a priority in its pursuit of accelerated development.  

The CC wishes to reiterate the need for the Government to increase its allocations for improving children’s access to education. Transparent reporting on the use of the budget for that purpose must also be available. Providing schools alone would not suffice. Access to schools should also be made a priority. With the two, the CC is confident that Malaysia will be able to further align itself towards achieving the goals of both the CRC and the SDGs.

-END-

Professor Dato’ Noor Aziah Hj. Mohd Awal, Children’s Commissioner

13 January 2022

Media queries: Contact Mrs. Norashikin Hamzah at 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 or shikin@suhakam.org.my

KENYATAAN MEDIA

KUALA LUMPUR (13 JANUARI 2022)   –   Pesuruhjaya Kanak-Kanak (PKK), Prof Dato’ Noor Aziah Mohd Awal menzahirkan dukacita dengan laporan akhbar pada 10 Januari 2022 yang memaparkan beberapa pelajar dari Sekolah Kebangsaan Sibuga Besar di Sandakan yang terpaksa menggunakan jambatan usang pada hari pertama persekolahan.

Laporan ini mengesahkan lagi dapatan PKK semasa lawatan pemantauan baru-baru ini di Sandakan bahawa kanak-kanak yang tinggal di kawasan pedalaman dan mereka yang tidak berdokumen, menghadapi kekangan akses kepada pendidikan arus perdana yang baik. PKK menyambut baik tindakan Majlis Perbandaran Sandakan dan Unit Penyelarasan Pelaksanaan, Jabatan Perdana Menteri, dalam kerjasama dan kepantasan mereka membuat penilaian bagi pembaikan atau pembinaan semula jambatan tersebut dan diharapkan usaha ini dapat dipercepatkan lagi. Dengan pengumuman penutupan jambatan tersebut, PKK berharap langkah alternatif seperti penyediaan bot secara percuma boleh dilaksanakan untuk membantu kanak-kanak ke sekolah. PKK juga berharap agar Kerajaan, melalui Jabatan Kerja Raya, akan terus memeriksa dan memastikan jalan raya, jambatan, infrakstruktur atau lain-lain kemudahan awam di bawah bidang kuasa dan fungsinya berada dalam keadaan yang baik dan disenggara secara berterusan. Usaha penilaian dan pembinaan semula perlu dilakukan secara proaktif dan bukan sahaja secara reaktif.

Wabak COVID-19 telah memberi impak kepada pembelajaran dan kesejahteraan kanak-kanak selama hampir dua tahun dan sekolah ditutup sepanjang pelaksanaan Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan (PKP). Dengan pembukaan sekolah, PKK merayu semua agensi kerajaan yang terlibat seperti Jabatan Pendidikan untuk memastikan semua kanak-kanak, terutamanya mereka di kawasan pedalaman mendapat akses pendidikan dan memastikan mereka disediakan dengan bantuan seperti pengangkutan dan persekitaran sekolah yang menjamin keselamatan dan kesejahteraan mereka.

Hak kepada pendidikan diiktiraf di peringkat antarabangsa di bawah Perkara 28(1) Konvensyen Mengenai Hak Kanak-Kanak (CRC). Asas kepada hak ini adalah keperluan di bawah Perkara 28(1)(e) untuk Negara pihak melaksanakan langkah-langkah yang mendorong kehadiran secara tetap ke sekolah dan menurunkan kadar keciciran. Matlamat 4 Pembangunan Lestari (SDG) Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu menekankan kepentingan pendidikan dan Negara pihak perlu memastikan Pendidikan yang saksama untuk semua. Walaupun Malaysia masih mengekalkan reservasi kepada Perkara 28(1)(a) mengenai tanggungjawab untuk menyediakan pendidikan rendah secara percuma, akses kepada pendidikan seharusnya menjadi keutamaan ke arah pembangunan yang semakin pesat.

PKK menekankan keperluan untuk Kerajaan menambah peruntukan bagi menambah baik akses kanak-kanak kepada pendidikan. Pelaporan yang telus mengenai penggunaan bajet untuk tujuan ini perlu disediakan. Pembinaan sekolah semata-mata adalah tidak mencukupi. Akses kepada pendidikan perlu diutamakan. Dengan pelaksanaan kedua-duanya, PKK yakin Malaysia dapat menjajarkan hala tujunya untuk mencapai matlamat-matlamat CRC dan SDGs.

-TAMAT-

Professor Dato’ Noor Aziah Hj. Mohd Awal, Pesuruhjaya Kanak-Kanak

13 Januari 2022

Pertanyaan Media: Sila hubungi Pn. Norashikin Hamzah melalui 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 atau shikin@suhakam.org.my

PS

Press Statement No. 15-2021 (OCC)_CC Lauds the Decision of the Court of Appeal on the Government’s Motion for Stay in the Suriani Kempe Case

PRESS STATEMENT

KUALA LUMPUR (24 DECEMBER 2021)   –   The Children’s Commissioner, Prof. Dato’ Noor Aziah Mohd Awal, lauds the decision of the Court of Appeal in the Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara & 2 Ors v Suriani Kempe & 6 Ors (Court of Appeal, Civil Appeal No. W-01(NCvC)(A)-531-09/2021), in dismissing the Government’s motion for a stay in the execution of the High Court decision. Following this, the Government should ensure that the National Registration Department complies with the recent ruling by issuing the children with all relevant documents, giving effect to their citizenship forthwith whilst the proposed amendment is still in progress.

Due to their status as non-citizens, these children have been experiencing difficulties in accessing public education and health services and their situation is worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic where they face difficulties entering the country to reunite with family members based locally due to documentation issues. These are instances of discrimination at the expense of innocent children. The Court of Appeal’s decision is welcome by many, especially these children as well as civil society organisations, and highlight the important role played by Courts as a key institution for check and balance, to uphold the best interest of children, consistent with Malaysia’s international obligations under Article 3 of the Convention the Rights of the Child (CRC).

On 16th December 2021, the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Parliament and Law), in his written reply to a question in Parliament stated that the Government has formed a committee to conduct a 6-month study on proposed amendments to Article 14(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution. The CC welcomes this decision as such amendments would remove any ambiguity on the machinations of Article 14(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution. However, CC is of the opinion that 6 months is too long and urges for a swift and judicious resolution to this long-standing issue. On the heels of these developments, a proper consultation with relevant groups is needed and CC hopes that a constitutional amendment will be taken to the next Parliament session

CC wishes to highlight this constitutional amendment concerning children’s right to nationality would enable Malaysia to comply with the non-discrimination principle as enunciated in the Article 2 of CRC and Article 1 of the Convention of the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and serve the purpose of guaranteeing Malaysian women the exercise and equal enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms.

-END-

Professor Dato’ Noor Aziah Hj. Mohd Awal, Children’s Commissioner

24 December 2021

Media queries: Contact Mrs. Norashikin Hamzah at 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 or shikin@suhakam.org.my

KENYATAAN MEDIA

KUALA LUMPUR (24 DISEMBER 2021)   –   Pesuruhjaya Kanak-Kanak (PKK), Prof. Dato’ Noor Aziah Mohd Awal, menyambut baik keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan dalam Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara & 2 Lagi v Suriani Kempe & 6 Lagi (Mahkamah Rayuan, Rayuan Sivil No. W-01(NCvC)(A)-531-09/2021), menolak usul Kerajaan untuk penggantungan pelaksanaan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi. Berikutan keputusan ini, pihak Kerajaan perlu memastikan Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara segera mengeluarkan dokumen-dokumen yang perlu untuk mendaftarkan kanak-kanak berkenaan sebagai warganegara sementara syor pindaan masih berjalan.

Oleh kerana status mereka bukan warganegara, kanak-kanak ini mengalami kesukaran dalam mendapat akses kepada perkhidmatan kesihatan dan pendidikan awam dan situasi ini diburukkan lagi oleh pandemic COVID-19 kerana mereka sukar untuk memasuki negara untuk bertemu ahli keluarga yang berada di dalam negara kerana isu-isu dokumentasi. Ini merupakan beberapa keadaan yang melibatkan diskriminasi terhadap kanak-kanak yang tidak bersalah. Sehubungan itu, keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan ini diterima baik oleh banyak pihak, terutamanya kanak-kanak dan organisasi-organisasi yang memperjuangkan hak asasi, ini pentingnya peranan penting mahkamah sebagai institusi semak dan imbang dalam menegakkan kepentingan kanak-kanak, bertepatan dengan obligasi antarabangsa Malaysia di bawah Perkara 3 Konvensyen Mengenai Hak Kanak-Kanak.

Pada 16 Disember 2021, Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri (Parliamen dan Undang-Undang), dalam jawapan kepada soalan di Parlimen, telah menjelaskan bahawa penubuhan sebuah jawatankuasa khas untuk melaksanakan kajian selama 6 bulan berkaitan pindaan kepada Perkara 14(1)(b) Perlembagaan Persekutuan. PKK menyambut baik keputusan ini kerana ia dapat menjelaskan kesamaran dalam interpretasi Perkara 14(1)(b) Perlembagaan Persekutuan. Namun begitu, PKK berpendapat bahawa tempoh 6 bulan adalah terlalu lama dan berharap agar penyelesaian segara dan adil dapat dibuat kepada isu yang sudah tertangguh sekian lama ini. Dalam perkembangan ini, PKK berharap pindaan kepada Perlembagaan Persekutuan dapat dibawa ke sesi Parliamen yang seterusnya.

PKK ingin menekankan bahawa pindaan kepada Perlembagaan berkaitan hak kerakyatan kanak-kanak akan menunjukkan pematuhan Malaysia kepada prinsip tiada diskriminasi selaras dengan Perkara 2 CRC dan Perkara 1 Konvensyen Penghapusan Semua Bentuk Diskrimnasi Terhadap Wanita (CEDAW) yang memberi jaminan kepada wanita Malaysia untuk menikmati dan mendapat hak dan kebebasan asasi.

-TAMAT-

Professor Dato’ Noor Aziah Hj. Mohd Awal, Pesuruhjaya Kanak-Kanak

24 Disember 2021

Pertanyaan Media: Sila hubungi Pn. Norashikin Hamzah melalui 03-2612 5687 / 019-621 5336 atau shikin@suhakam.org.my