2

Kenyataan Media No. 40-2025 (OCC)_Penjelasan Mengenai Undang-undang Rogol Statutori: Melindungi Kanak-kanak daripada Eksploitasi

KUALA LUMPUR (24 September 2025) – Pejabat Pesuruhjaya Kanak-kanak (OCC), SUHAKAM ingin memberikan penjelasan kepada orang awam mengenai prinsip undang-undang berkaitan rogol statutori di bawah Seksyen 375(g) Kanun Keseksaan, khususnya berhubung isu persetujuan (consent) dan perlindungan kanak-kanak.

Undang-undang ini digubal atas asas bahawa kanak-kanak perempuan bawah umur 16 tahun tidak mempunyai kapasiti undang-undang untuk memberikan persetujuan kepada sebarang bentuk hubungan seksual. Ini bermakna, walaupun wujud keadaan yang dilihat sebagai “suka sama suka”, undang-undang tetap menganggap kanak-kanak perempuan sebagai mangsa. Rasionalnya ialah kanak-kanak perempuan masih belum matang dari segi fizikal, mental dan emosi, dan mudah terdedah kepada manipulasi, pujukan atau eksploitasi oleh pihak lain. Berikutan itu, kanak-kanak perempuan yang menjadi mangsa perlu dilindungi oleh undang-undang bagi mengelakkan trauma berganda dan memastikan mereka tidak dipersalahkan atau dihukum. Hukuman dalam kes ini hanya dikenakan kepada pihak lelaki yang melakukan perbuatan tersebut, sama ada lelaki dewasa atau kanak-kanak di bawah umur 18 tahun.

Bagi pelaku kanak-kanak lelaki, undang-undang membolehkan mereka didakwa, tetapi tertakluk kepada prinsip khas keadilan kanak-kanak. Menurut Seksyen 91 Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001 [Akta 611], mahkamah akan mengenakan perintah untuk kanak-kanak yang didapati bersalah seperti penempatan di sekolah diluluskan (Sekolah Tunas Bakti) dan Sekolah Henry Gurney. Pendekatan ini menyeimbangkan prinsip akauntabiliti dengan memberikan peluang kedua kepada kanak-kanak, agar pelaku kanak-kanak tidak dihukum seperti pesalah dewasa tetapi tetap bertanggungjawab dan diberikan pemulihan.

OCC menegaskan bahawa undang-undang rogol statutori bukan untuk menghukum kanak-kanak perempuan yang menjadi mangsa, tetapi untuk melindungi mereka daripada sebarang bentuk eksploitasi dan diskriminasi. Undang-undang ini mencerminkan komitmen Malaysia terhadap kepentingan terbaik kanak-kanak sebagaimana yang digariskan dalam Konvensyen Mengenai Hak Kanak-kanak 1989 (CRC) dan Akta 611.

OCC menyeru semua pihak, khususnya agensi penguatkuasa, pendidik dan masyarakat, untuk memahami dan mempertahankan prinsip ini. Melindungi kanak-kanak adalah tanggungjawab bersama, dan setiap mereka berhak mendapat perlindungan penuh daripada eksploitasi serta peluang untuk membesar dengan selamat dan sihat.

-TAMAT-

Pejabat Pesuruhjaya Kanak-Kanak (OCC)
Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM) 

Tarikh: 24 SEPTEMBER 2025

1

Media Statement No. 40-2025 (OCC)_Clarification on Statutory Rape Laws: Protecting Children from Exploitation

KUALA LUMPUR (24 September 2025) – The Office of the Children’s Commissioner (OCC), SUHAKAM wishes to provide clarification to the public regarding the legal principles of statutory rape under Section 375(g) of the Penal Code, particularly on the issue of consent and the protection of children.

This law is based on the principle that girls under the age of 16 do not have the legal capacity to give consent to any form of sexual activity. This means that even if a situation appears to be “mutual,” the law still regards the girl as a victim. The rationale is that girls at this age are not yet mature physically, mentally, or emotionally, and are easily exposed to manipulation, persuasion, or exploitation by others. Therefore, the law ensures that girls who are victims are protected from double trauma and are not blamed or punished. Punishment in these cases applies only to the male perpetrator, whether he is an adult or a child under the age of 18.

For male child perpetrators, the law allows them to be charged, but subject to the special principles of juvenile justice. According to Section 91 of the Child Act 2001 [Act 611], the court has the authority to issue orders for children, including placement in approved institutions (Sekolah Tunas Bakti) or Henry Gurney Schools. This approach strikes a balance between accountability and rehabilitation, providing young offenders with a second chance. They are not punished like adult criminals, but are still held responsible and undergo rehabilitation.

The OCC emphasises that statutory rape laws are not intended to punish girl victims, but to protect them from any form of exploitation and discrimination. These laws reflect Malaysia’s commitment to the best interests of the child as outlined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Child Act 2001.

The OCC calls on all parties, particularly enforcement agencies, educators, and society at large, to understand and uphold this principle. Protecting children is a collective responsibility, and every child deserves full protection from exploitation and the opportunity to grow up safely and healthily.

-END-

The Office of the Children’s Commissioner (OCC)
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) 

Date: 24 September 2025

Template PS 2025

Media Statement No. 39-2025_SUHAKAM Reaffirms the Importance of FOE in Malaysia

(KUALA LUMPUR) 22 SEPTEMBER 2025 – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) notes with concern over recent reports that the president of University of Malaya Association of New Youth (UMANY) is under police investigation for statements he had made in the course of the Association’s activities. It was reported that he had suggested that the matriculation system be replaced by STPM as the sole standard for admission into public universities. One may agree or disagree with his view, but it is far-fetched to say that his statement is the subject of a crime and deserves investigation under section 505(b) of the Penal Code.

SUHAKAM wishes to reiterate here that freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right guaranteed under Article 10 of the Federal Constitution and remains an essential part of Malaysia’s democratic framework. This right is also enshrined in international human rights standards, including Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Whilst 174 countries have already ratified or acceded to the ICCPR, Malaysia, sadly, has yet to be a party to this International Covenant. SUHAKAM has consistently advocated for Malaysia’s accession to the ICCPR, and for national laws and practices to align with these universal principles. By doing so, it would signal Malaysia’s strong commitment to human rights and strengthen its democratic institutions.

Student organisations and youth groups play a vital role in shaping democratic discourse by bringing new perspectives, asking difficult questions, and contributing to constructive debate. Their voices, regardless their political views,  should be protected and encouraged, as they represent an important part of Malaysia’s future leadership and democratic growth. Silencing or discouraging their participation risks weakening civic engagement at a time when inclusive dialogue is most needed. Moreover, as had been said by Justice Hishamudin Yunus in the landmark Court of Appeal case of Muhammad Hilman Idham & Ors v. Kerajaan Malaysia [2011] 9 CLJ 50 –

“Universities should be the breeding ground of reformers and thinkers, and not institutions to produce students trained as robots”.

We wish to add here that scholarship cannot flourish in an atmosphere of suspicion and distrust.

SUHAKAM recognises the important role of the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) in maintaining public order and safety. However, SUHAKAM is of the view that investigations involving matters of expression should be conducted with sensitivity, proportionality, and respect for constitutional guarantees. Hence, SUHAKAM advocates that it is high time that the PDRM and other enforcement agencies cease practising the stereotyped approach often perceived as being anti-human rights; and instead adopt a matured and professional rights-based approach in such matters. A matured and professional rights-based approach will help to strengthen public confidence and public respect in law enforcement institutions whilst ensuring that the space for open dialogue remains safeguarded.

SUHAKAM reiterates its long-standing position that freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a healthy democracy. We urge all parties to work together to foster an environment where diverse voices, especially those of youth, can be expressed openly and constructively in the spirit of building for a more tolerant, democratic and rights-respecting Malaysia.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

Date: 22 September 2025

1

Media Statement No. 38-2025_SUHAKAM Calls on Malaysian Government to Intervene in Imminent Executions of Malaysians in Singapore

(KUALA LUMPUR) 10 SEPTEMBER 2025 – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) expresses grave concern over reports of the imminent executions of four Malaysian citizens, Datchinamurthy a/l Kataiah, Pannir Selvam Pranthaman, Saminathan a/l Selvaraju, and Lingkesvaran Rajendaren who are currently on death row in Singapore for drug-related offences.

SUHAKAM’s stance against the death penalty is rooted in our unwavering belief in justice, dignity, and the possibility of rehabilitation for all. The mandatory death sentence strips judges of the discretion to weigh the individual circumstances of each case, undermining the principles of fairness that should form the foundation of any legal system.

Although Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) permits the use of the death penalty only for the “most serious” crimes, SUHAKAM emphasizes that the Human Rights Committee, which interprets the Covenant, has consistently ruled that drug-related offences do not meet this standard.

The planned execution violates Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which affirms that “everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.” The irreversible nature of the death penalty, particularly in cases with significant mitigating factors, erodes the core values of human dignity and justice.

In line with Malaysia’s own reform path, including the abolition of the mandatory death penalty in 2023, SUHAKAM reiterates its opposition to the death penalty in all circumstances, and stresses that the use of capital punishment for drug offences is both unlawful and disproportionate.

SUHAKAM therefore urges the Malaysian Government to:

  1. Take all possible diplomatic and legal measures to safeguard the rights and lives of Malaysian citizens on death row abroad.
  2. Engage international and regional human rights mechanisms to ensure their cases receive due consideration; and
  3. Continue Malaysia’s leadership role in advocating for the progressive abolition of the death penalty at the regional and international levels.

SUHAKAM stands firm in advocating for justice, compassion, and the inherent rights of all individuals, regardless of nationality or circumstance and will continue to support efforts to protect the rights of Malaysians overseas and to advance the broader movement towards the abolition of the death penalty.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)
Date: 10 September 2025

Template PS 2025

Joint Media Statement_MoU Signing Between SUHAKAM and the Human Rights Commission of the Maldives (HRCM)

PUTRAJAYA, MALAYSIA (8 SEPTEMBER 2025) – Today, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) and the Human Rights Commission of the Maldives (HRCM) signed a four-year Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) commencing on 8 September 2025.

The MoU was signed by SUHAKAM’s Chairman, Dato’ Seri Mohd Hishamudin Yunus, and HRCM’s President, Ms. Mariyam Muna. The MoU formalises the intention of both national human rights institutions (NHRIs) to strengthen cooperation through consultations, information exchange, capacity building, knowledge sharing and the exchange of experiences in the promotion and protection of human rights at national, regional and international levels.

The Republic of Maldives, by its constitution, a democratic Republic based on the principles of Islam, acceded to UNCAT on 20 April 2004, and ratified the Optional Protocol (OPCAT) on 15 February 2006. In April 2008, as prescribed under the OPCAT, the government of the Maldives legislatively designated HRCM as the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM).

By this MoU, SUHAKAM, through the HCRM, seeks to draw on the experiences and best practices of the Republic of Maldives. This knowledge exchange is expected to strengthen SUHAKAM’s advocacy for Malaysia’s accession to UNCAT, particularly, in addressing issues relating to the compatibility of UNCAT with Shari’ah law. At the same time, HRCM expresses interest in learning from SUHAKAM’s initiative in human rights education, particularly, the Human Rights Best Practices (ATHAM) in Schools programmes, designed to inculcate awareness and understanding of human rights among teachers and students in schools.

The MoU underscores the commitments of both SUHAKAM and HRCM to strengthen bilateral cooperation by focusing on training and capacity building vide the Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA), technical assistance, and the sharing of expertise on areas including, but not limited to, UNCAT, Shari’ah law and human rights education as well as any other mutually agreed areas of collaboration.

Both institutions hope that this MoU will provide a meaningful platform for stakeholders in Malaysia and the Maldives to engage in constructive dialogue on human rights issues and to advance the shared objectives of the agreement.

The MoU signing ceremony was held in conjunction with the Closed-Door High-Level Dialogue on Torture Prevention at The Everly Putrajaya, Putrajaya, on 8 September 2025. The dialogue was officiated by SUHAKAM’s Chairman, Dato’ Seri Mohd Hishamudin Yunus, whilst HRCM’s President, Ms. Mariyam Muna, participated as a resource person, sharing HCRM’s expertise and the Republic of the Maldives’s experience in harmonising international human rights frameworks with Islamic Principles in acceding to UNCAT.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)
Human Rights Commission of the Maldives (HRCM)
Date: 8 September 2025

Template PS 2025

Media Statement No. 37-2025_SUHAKAM Welcome Gig Workers Bill, Calls for Strengthened Protections and Inclusive Consultation

KUALA LUMPUR (28 AUGUST 2025) – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) welcomes the tabling of the Gig Workers Bill 2025 as an important step towards recognising and protecting the rights of gig economy workers in Malaysia. Gig workers, including e-hailing and p-hailing drivers as well as freelancers across various sectors, play a vital role in supporting Malaysia’s economy and providing essential services to the public.

By introducing legal recognition and extending social and workplace protections, the Bill marks a positive move towards addressing long-standing vulnerabilities faced by gig workers. These include gaps in social protection, uncertainty in employment status, lack of dispute resolution mechanisms, and insufficient safeguards for fair remuneration and occupational safety.

At the same time, SUHAKAM believes that further refinements are necessary to ensure that the Bill fully delivers on its promise of dignity and fairness for gig workers while maintaining the genuine flexibility that makes the gig economy attractive to many and an important engine of economic growth.

Therefore, SUHAKAM wishes to recommend the following:

i.          A clear framework to ensure guaranteed minimum payment rates, either by hours worked or tasks completed, including clarity on deductions for contributions and the timeline for wage payments by service providers.

ii.         Mandatory contributions by service providers to PERKESO/EPF must be enforced, with legal action taken against non-compliant companies.

iii.        Right to privacy must be respected and workers’ personal data should not be misused for rating or scoring systems, consistent with Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).

iv.        Access to legal aid should be extended to gig workers, covering legal advice and representation at tribunals. The National Legal Aid Foundation’s (YBGK’s) resources should be strengthened to enable support for gig workers.

v.         Gig workers must be explicitly permitted to unionise under the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Revised 1976) (Act 177) (IRA) and engage in collective bargaining to ensure their voices are heard in shaping fairer working conditions.

SUHAKAM further emphasises that the establishment of the Special Gig Economy Workers Commission (SEGIM) must consider that gig workers’ issues are cross-cutting in nature, involving multiple ministries. Effective coordination is therefore essential to ensure comprehensive protection and coherent policy responses.

In line with its statutory mandate to advise and assist the Government on matters relating to human rights, SUHAKAM regrets that it was not consulted in the drafting of the Bill, despite the recent amendment of the SUHAKAM Act which further strengthens its advisory role. SUHAKAM also expresses concern that the Government only made the Bill public at a very last stage in the legislative process. SUHAKAM should have been formally included in the consultation process. Therefore, SUHAKAM urges the Ministry concerned that at the Second Reading stage of the Bill in Parliament the Bill is not passed as yet. Instead the Bill ought to be submitted to the appropriate Parliamentary Select Committee for detail scrutiny by the PSC of the provisions of the Bill.

SUHAKAM stands ready to work with the Government and relevant stakeholders to ensure that the legislation is consistent with human rights principles and contributes to the goal of decent work for all.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)
Date: 28 August 2025

Template PS 2025

Media Statement No. 36-2025 (OCC)_Zara Qairina Case Children Must Be Protected, Not Stigmatised

KUALA LUMPUR (19 AUGUST 2025) – SUHAKAM takes note of the charges to be brought against five children in the case involving the late Zara Qairina Mahathir. We urge the public and media to act responsibly and observe the following:

  1. The children are entitled to full protection under the Child Act 2001 [Act 611], including trauma-informed support, legal representation and fair treatment.
  1. Their identities must not be revealed directly or indirectly. No names, photos, schools or any details that could lead to them being identified should be made public. Section 15 of the Act makes it a punishable offence to publish any information that could identify children involved in court proceedings. Penalties include up to RM10,000 or 5 years’ imprisonment, or both.
  1. The Court for Children is a closed court under Section 12 of the Child Act 2001. Only parties directly involved are permitted to attend. The privacy of the children must be respected.

SUHAKAM’s priority is to prevent further stigmatisation of the children involved. We remind the public that bullying, whether in schools or online, is never acceptable.

Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and TikTok are strongly urged to update their internal policies and community standards to proactively flag and remove any content that breaches Section 15 of the Child Act 2001. Any content published that could identify the children likely amplifies harm to them, whether unintentionally or maliciously. Waiting for takedown requests may allow illegal and harmful content to spread widely, defeating the protective intent of the law. Failure to act risks further harm to the children and may amount to complicity in unlawful disclosure.

Let justice take its course in accordance with child rights and the rule of law.

-END-

The Office of the Children’s Commissioner (OCC)
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) 

Date: 19 August 2025

Template PS 2025

Media Statement No. 35-2025 (OCC)_Bullying is a Violation of Children’s Rights-OCC Urges Stronger Action in Schools

KUALA LUMPUR (18 AUGUST 2025) – The Office of the Children’s Commissioner (OCC), Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) emphasises that all forms of bullying are unacceptable and must be addressed immediately. Such behaviour violates the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), to which Malaysia has ratified and is punishable under Malaysian law, including the recent introduction of section 507B – 507G of the Penal Code. Every child is entitled to attend school and reside in a dormitory free from fear, harassment or violence.

The OCC suggests creating a nationwide, inclusive, one-stop Anti-Bullying Portal to manage reports of physical, cyber and institutional bullying. This portal should be child-friendly, multilingual and accessible to children with disabilities, featuring sign language videos, text and audio options. It should enable children to report anonymously to ensure their safety and to track the status of their reports. The platform should provide step-by-step guidance and direct links for emergencies, mental health issues, school problems and cyber incidents, connecting users to relevant authorities like Talian Kasih, MOE, MARA, PDRM, JKM and MCMC. Additionally, it should link directly to social media platforms for takedown requests. Offline methods such as SMS and complaint boxes at schools and institutions should also be available.

All schools and dormitories are required to have a formal Child Protection Policy signed by teachers, wardens and parents, designed with the children’s input. This policy should include anti-bullying clauses, clear reporting procedures, victim protection measures and mandatory training. Parents, the parents-teachers association (PTA) and schools must make a formal pledge to prevent bullying, attend parenting workshops and actively follow up on intervention plans for their children.

Teachers play a vital role in creating safe and inclusive learning environments. At present, the children’s rights syllabus at the Institutes of Teacher Education (IPG) is limited in scope, having been developed without consultation or input from the OCC. To ensure alignment with the CRC, the OCC proposes that the syllabus be reviewed by us and strengthened accordingly. Additionally, the OCC also notes that the human rights module jointly developed with IPG, which includes a chapter on children’s rights, is still optional and therefore, we strongly urge that this module be made mandatory for all trainee teachers at IPG and extended to in-service teachers nationwide to ensure that all educators are well equipped to protect, uphold and promote children’s rights.

The OCC further calls on the Government, the Ministry of Education, schools, teachers, parents and the community to take urgent action. Enforcement of laws, enhancement of reporting channels and safeguarding the privacy of children, regardless whether they are victims or alleged perpetrators, are essential. Bullying is not rooted in our culture; it is a violation of rights that must be eliminated.

-END-

The Office of the Children’s Commissioner (OCC)
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) 

Date: 18 August 2025

3

KARAMAH INSANIYYAH DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA – MENGHORMATI KANAK-KANAK, MENOLAK BULI

Oleh: Prof Madya Dr Mohd Al Adib Samuri
Pesuruhjaya Kanak-Kanak, SUHAKAM
Pensyarah di Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Malaysia sekali lagi dikejutkan dengan kes buli di sekolah, dan lebih memilukan apabila perbuatan tersebut mengakibatkan kehilangan nyawa.

Buli bukan sahaja melibatkan fizikal dan lisan, tetapi turut merangkumi bentuk psikologi dan sosial. Ini termasuklah ejekan, pengasingan daripada rakan sebaya, serta penyebaran aib melalui media sosial.

Buli juga menyebabkan trauma yang mendalam pada diri kanak-kanak yang menjadi mangsa, dan mungkin menjadikan dirinya terasing daripada persekitaran sosialnya.

Walaupun sering dianggap sekadar ‘gurauan’ antara rakan sebaya, buli sebenarnya merupakan satu bentuk penganiayaan, kezaliman, dan penghinaan yang jelas dilarang dalam agama.

Kajian menunjukkan bahawa buli dalam kalangan kanak-kanak memberi kesan langsung terhadap kesihatan mental, pencapaian akademik, dan pembentukan harga diri mangsa.

Perbuatan ini jelas melanggar hak kanak-kanak seperti dalam Konvensyen Mengenai Hak Kanak-Kanak (CRC), yang seiring dengan Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001 bagi melindungi semua kanak-kanak di Malaysia.

Antara hak yang terjejas termasuklah hak untuk hidup dalam keadaan selamat, bebas daripada penderaan dan kezaliman, serta hak untuk dihormati maruahnya.

Namun begitu, apa yang jarang dibincangkan dalam wacana awam ialah bagaimana al-Quran secara konsisten menolak sebarang bentuk penganiayaan, kezaliman, penghinaan dan pencabulan maruah sesama manusia, termasuk terhadap kanak-kanak.

Nilai akhlak yang digariskan oleh al-Quran ini boleh membawa kebaikan kepada seluruh masyarakat, tanpa mengira latar belakang bangsa dan agama mereka.

Dalil al-Quran yang Menolak Buli

Walaupun istilah ‘buli’ tidak disebut secara literal dalam al-Quran, terdapat banyak ayat yang boleh dijadikan asas untuk menolak perbuatan buli seperti ejekan, penghinaan, kezaliman, cercaan, dan penyebaran aib.

Pertama, al-Quran jelas melarang ejekan, penghinaan dan gelaran yang menjatuhkan maruah. Dalam Surah al-Hujurat ayat 11, Allah berfirman:

“Wahai orang-orang yang beriman! Janganlah sesuatu puak (dari kaum lelaki) mencemuh dan merendah-rendahkan puak lelaki yang lain, (kerana) boleh jadi puak yang dicemuhkan itu lebih baik daripada mereka; …dan janganlah setengah kamu menyatakan keaiban setengahnya yang lain; dan janganlah pula kamu panggil-memanggil antara satu dengan yang lain dengan gelaran yang buruk.”

al-Tabari dalam Jami’ al-Bayan fi Tafsir al-Quran mengatakan bahawa larangan ini merujuk kepada gelaran-gelaran yang dibenci oleh orang yang digelar. Sama ada ia berdasarkan latar belakangnya, keaibannya, atau apa sahaja panggilan yang mencetuskan kemarahan.

Kedua, al-Quran melarang penyebaran aib dan fitnah yang sering menjadi elemen utama dalam buli siber. Firman Allah dalam Surah al-Nur ayat 19:

“Sesungguhnya orang yang suka agar perbuatan keji itu tersebar di kalangan orang yang beriman, bagi mereka azab yang pedih di dunia dan di akhirat.”

Menurut Ibn Kathir dalam Tafsir al-Quran al-Azhim, ayat ini merupakan teguran kepada sesiapa yang apabila mendengar sesuatu perkara yang buruk, terus menyebarkannya kepada orang lain. Sedangkan sepatutnya, perkara buruk itu tidak perlu diperbesar-besarkan atau disebarkan.

Dalam era media sosial, sebahagian pelajar sekolah sudah terdedah kepada budaya merakam, menyebar, dan menjadikan aib atau penderitaan rakan sebagai bahan hiburan.

Ini bukan sahaja melanggar hak peribadi kanak-kanak lain, tetapi termasuk dalam kategori perbuatan keji yang ditegah oleh al-Quran.

Ketiga, al-Quran juga mengharamkan perbuatan menyakiti orang lain, sama ada melalui perbuatan mahupun kata-kata.

Perbuatan buli yang menyakitkan emosi atau fizikal pelajar lain dengan sengaja adalah termasuk dalam bentuk kezaliman yang ditegah oleh al-Quran sebagaimana dalam Surah al-Ahzab ayat 58:

“Dan orang yang menyakiti orang mukmin lelaki dan perempuan tanpa kesalahan yang mereka lakukan, maka sesungguhnya mereka telah memikul kesalahan menuduh secara dusta, dan berbuat dosa yang amat nyata.” 

al-Qurtubi dalam al-Jami’ li al-Ahkam al-Quran menyatakan bahawa antara bentuk perbuatan yang menyakiti orang lain ialah dengan memperlekehkan keturunannya, merendahkan pekerjaan yang dilakukannya, atau menyebut sesuatu yang menyakitkan hatinya apabila didengar.

Beliau menegaskan bahawa menyakiti orang lain adalah perbuatan yang diharamkan dalam Islam.

Hormati Kanak-kanak 

Kanak-kanak adalah individu yang sedang membesar. Seperti mana orang dewasa, mereka juga mempunyai hak, martabat, maruah dan kehormatan yang mesti dijaga. 

Tindakan membuli menjejaskan karāmah insāniyyah atau kemuliaan insan yang ada pada diri seseorang. Allah berfirman dalam Surah al-Isra’ ayat 70:

“Dan sesungguhnya Kami telah memuliakan anak-anak Adam…”

Kemuliaan ini termasuk hak untuk dilayan dengan hormat, dihargai, dan bebas daripada penganiayaan oleh rakan sebaya.

Apabila buli dianggap “lumrah sekolah” atau “budaya asrama”, ia bukan sahaja merendahkan nilai insan pada diri kanak-kanak, tetapi turut mencerminkan kegagalan masyarakat dalam mempertahankan hak kanak-kanak.

Pendekatan

Pendekatan menangani buli tidak boleh bersifat reaktif atau terhad kepada tindakan disiplin dan hukuman semata-mata.

Pendekatan hendaklah bersifat menyeluruh, berfokus kepada hak kanak-kanak dan kepentingan terbaik mereka yang mesti diutamakan.

Ia mesti berakar pada pendidikan nilai dan akhlak, penerapan kesedaran agama, penghormatan terhadap hak orang lain, dan pembinaan komuniti sekolah yang selamat dan inklusif.

Guru dan pemimpin pelajar perlu dibekalkan latihan tentang intervensi awal dan pengecaman tanda-tanda buli.

Ibu bapa dan NGO juga perlu dilibatkan dalam program advokasi dan intervensi, di peringkat awal lagi sebelum kejadian buli berlaku.

Di rumah atau di sekolah, kanak-kanak juga perlu dididik secara berterusan bahawa membuli adalah dilarang sepenuhnya dalam agama dan undang-undang.

Kesimpulannya, al-Quran jelas menolak kezaliman seperti buli dan mengangkat maruah manusia.

Prinsip ini seiring dengan hak kanak-kanak untuk dilindungi keselamatan dan martabatnya seperti yang ditekankan dalam CRC, dan wajar dijadikan panduan dalam usaha menangani buli.