Posts in category: Uncategorized

KUALA LUMPUR (9 JUNE 2026) – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) welcomes the decision by the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA) to reaffirm SUHAKAM’s accreditation as an “A Status” National Human Rights Institution (NHRI). 

The re-accreditation reflects continued international recognition of SUHAKAM’s compliance with the Paris Principles, the international standards adopted by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) that govern the independence, effectiveness, pluralism, and mandate of national human rights institutions. SUHAKAM acknowledges the SCA’s recognition of the Commission’s continued efforts in promoting and protecting human rights in Malaysia, as well as the constructive recommendations provided to further strengthen the institution. 

SUHAKAM takes note of the recommendations relating to, among others, strengthening its functional and operational independence, enhancing the transparency and independence of the appointment and dismissal processes, ensuring adequate funding, enabling unannounced visits to all places of deprivation of liberty, strengthening parliamentary engagement with SUHAKAM reports, and reinforcing institutional capacity to effectively fulfil its expanding mandate, including its child rights responsibilities. 

SUHAKAM views these recommendations as important guidance towards further strengthening the institution in line with the Paris Principles and international best practices governing independent national human rights institutions. SUHAKAM remains committed to continuing engagement with the Government, Parliament, civil society organisations, and all relevant stakeholders to support legal and institutional reforms that reinforce SUHAKAM’s independence, effectiveness, accessibility, and public accountability.

As an “A Status” NHRI, SUHAKAM is able to participate fully in international and regional human rights mechanisms, including the United Nations Human Rights Council and treaty body processes. This status is important not merely as a form of international recognition, but because it affirms the importance of having an independent, credible, and effective institution dedicated to promoting and protecting the human rights of all persons in Malaysia.

Moving forward, SUHAKAM will continue to strengthen its institutional capacity, uphold the highest standards of integrity and independence, and enhance its engagement with the public in addressing both longstanding and emerging human rights challenges. The Commission remains steadfast in its vision of building a Malaysia grounded in human dignity, equality, justice, accountability, and respect for universal human rights principles.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

9 June 2026

The Report and Recommendations of the 47th Session of the Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA) can be accessed at:

⁠https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/countries/nhri/ganhri/sca-report-47th-session-en.pdf

or scan the QR code below:

KUALA LUMPUR (1 MAY 2026) – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) expresses deep concern over the compounding impact of current economic challenges on vulnerable groups, particularly women, children, and low-income communities, including undocumented, stateless persons, and refugees in light of recent reports indicating proposed reductions in public expenditure for critical sectors.

Recent developments indicate that the Treasury of Malaysia has proposed RM5.4 billion in budget cuts affecting the health and higher education ministries. The proposed reductions to the Ministry of Health, is of course most worrying as it comes at a time when demand for public healthcare, nutrition support, and essential social services is increasing, particularly, among those most affected by the rising cost of living.

SUHAKAM stresses that fiscal retrenchment in healthcare during periods of economic pressure is particularly concerning. Evidence globally shows that healthcare systems are often among the hardest hit during crises, with long-term consequences for public health outcomes. In Malaysia, such reductions risk further exacerbating existing gaps in access, quality, and equity in healthcare services

SUHAKAM is concerned that such reductions, if implemented without adequate safeguards, risk undermining access to essential services that are critical to the protection of human rights, particularly in the areas of women’s health, child development, and the well-being of other vulnerable and marginalised groups, including the elderly, persons with disabilities, and low-income households. Economic hardship places added strain on households and may lead to adverse health outcomes, including reduced access to nutritious food, delayed healthcare seeking, and worsening physical and mental health conditions.

SUHAKAM further emphasises that such measures may constitute a regressive step in the realisation of economic, social, and cultural rights.  Malaysia has voluntarily committed to Sustainable Development Goal 3: Good Health and Wellbeing, which aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. In particular, Target 3(c) calls for increased health financing and strengthened health workforce capacity. SUHAKAM notes that both the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Economy have identified SDG 3 as a national priority due to its significant social impact. These commitments must be meaningfully upheld. The Government must not regress on the public right to health, a core economic, social and cultural human right. Public right to health is also a constitutional right protected by the Federal Constitution. Any fiscal consolidation measures must be carefully calibrated to avoid undermining equitable access to healthcare and essential support systems.

SUHAKAM reiterates that the right to health, adequate food, and well-being are fundamental human rights, protected by the Federal Constitution, as well as reflected in international obligations including the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).

In this regard, SUHAKAM calls on the Government to:

1. Ensure that any fiscal consolidation measures do not disproportionately impact vulnerable populations, particularly, the elderly, women, children, and low-income groups;
2. Safeguard and, where necessary, increase allocations for essential health services, in line with SDG commitments, including maternal and reproductive health, child nutrition, and mental health support;
3. Strengthen community-based health and social support systems, particularly for underserved and at-risk populations;
4. Expand targeted social assistance, including food and nutrition support for low-income families;
5. Adopt a human rights-based approach to budgeting, ensuring transparency, participation, and accountability in fiscal decision-making.

SUHAKAM stresses that policy responses to economic pressures must not come at the expense of the most vulnerable. Commitments to sustainable development and human rights must be matched by concrete policy choices. Malaysia must not only prioritise SDG 3 in principle but also reflect this priority in practice. The Commission remains committed to working with all stakeholders to ensure that Malaysia’s development policies uphold human dignity and leave no one behind.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

1 May 2026

KUALA LUMPUR (25 APRIL 2026) – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) notes the recent developments concerning the appointment of the Chief Commissioner of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and statement by the Prime Minister that a list of candidates for the position has been presented to His Majesty the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. This development raises grave concern on the constitutionality of the process and calls for the importance of ensuring that the appointment process continues to be carried out strictly in accordance with the Constitution and the applicable statutory framework. SUHAKAM therefore stresses that the Prime Minister bears the constitutional responsibility to advise on this appointment and must discharge this duty with firmness, clarity, and fidelity to the law. The proper exercise of this responsibility is essential to preserving constitutional order and maintaining public confidence in national institutions

SUHAKAM wishes to stress here that Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy founded upon the principle of the supremacy of the Federal Constitution and the rule of law. Within this constitutional framework, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong acts in accordance with constitutional provisions, including the well-established principle that His Majesty’s in the exercise of his functions shall act on the advice of the Prime Minister or the Cabinet, except in very limited and clearly defined circumstances. This is clearly spelt out in Article 40 of the Federal Constitution.

In this regard, Section 5(1) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (Act 694) expressly provides that the Chief Commissioner shall be appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the Prime Minister. When this provision is read together with Article 40 of the Federal Constitution, what is stipulated is that the effective appointing authority is conferred by the Constitution and the law to the Prime Minister. The role of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in the appointment process is merely formal or ceremonial. His Majesty must accept whoever the Prime Minister advices should be appointed. Of course, His Majesty is not precluded from giving his views or advice or seeking more information on the Prime Minister’ choice; however, ultimately, the Prime Minister’s advice or choice prevails. Any departure from this constitutional framework is inconsistent with and violates the Federal Constitution and undermines Malaysia’s democratic system of governance.

At the same time, SUHAKAM respectfully underscores the sanctity of the Federal Constitution as the supreme law of the Federation. All institutions of the State, including the monarchy, have distinct and important roles that must be exercised within the respective constitutional limits. Upholding these boundaries is vital to ensuring stability, accountability, and respect for the rule of law.

SUHAKAM further notes the growing calls for institutional reform to strengthen the independence of the MACC, including the adoption of a more transparent and merit-based appointment process. Consideration should also be given to mechanisms such as Parliamentary vetting or oversight to ensure that appointments are subject to appropriate checks and remain free from undue influence. The independence and credibility of the MACC depend not only on the individual appointed, but also on the integrity and legality of the appointment process itself. Any perception of constitutional deviation risks eroding public trust in anti-corruption efforts and governance more broadly.

SUHAKAM calls for full and strict adherence to the Federal Constitution and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 in the appointment of the next Chief Commissioner, while also encouraging meaningful reforms to enhance transparency, accountability, and institutional integrity in the longer term.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

25 April 2026

KUALA LUMPUR (11 APRIL 2026) – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) welcomes the announcement of a ceasefire in the ongoing conflict in West Asia and expresses hope that it will bring an immediate end to the immense suffering endured by civilians, particularly women and children.

Notwithstanding this positive development, SUHAKAM emphasises that a ceasefire must be accompanied by credible accountability measures for all alleged violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law committed during the conflict.

SUHAKAM is gravely concerned by reports that Palestinian detainees are being subjected to mass death sentences, with claims that thousands may face capital punishment. In this regard, SUHAKAM echoes the concerns raised by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, which has warned that legislative measures enabling the imposition of the death penalty against Palestinians may constitute a discriminatory regime of capital punishment, fundamentally incompatible with international law. Such measures raise serious and systemic due process violations, including the denial of fair trial guarantees and judicial independence. The targeted application of the death penalty against a specific population group may amount to collective punishment and could constitute serious violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law, potentially rising to the level of international crimes.

The imposition of the death penalty in a discriminatory manner, reportedly applied exclusively against Palestinians, constitutes a grave violation of fundamental human rights, including the right to life, equality before the law, and the right to a fair trial.

In this regard, SUHAKAM calls on the European Union to urgently review and suspend the EU–Israel Association Agreement, in line with its human rights commitments. Continued economic engagement in the face of credible allegations of grave violations risks undermining the integrity of international human rights standards.

SUHAKAM further urges the international community to take immediate and concrete measures to ensure the protection of civilians, uphold the rule of law, and guarantee accountability for all violations, without exception. A just and lasting peace can only be achieved through full respect for international law, human dignity, and fundamental freedoms for all.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

11 April 2026

KUALA LUMPUR (10 APRIL 2026) – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) expresses concern regarding a recent incident at a public forum in Kuala Lumpur, where three individuals were reportedly arrested and detained by the police after briefly displaying placards during a speech by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Chief Commissioner. SUHAKAM notes that the individuals have since been released. However, despite their subsequent release, SUHAKAM remains concerned about the circumstances and justification for the initial arrests.

Given that the act in question appears to have been peaceful and within the scope of protected expression, the arrests raise important questions about how the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly are interpreted and applied in practice. In this regard, SUHAKAM reiterates its consistent position that the right to freedom of expression is a fundamental liberty guaranteed under Article 10(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution and Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). As a cornerstone of a democratic society, this right enables individuals to express views, engage in public discourse, and participate meaningfully in matters of public interest. While not absolute, any restrictions must comply with established international human rights principles, including those reflected in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which require that limitations be lawful, necessary, and proportionate.

In this regard, SUHAKAM emphasises that the Government has an obligation not only to regulate, but also to facilitate and protect the exercise of these rights. This includes ensuring that individuals are able to express their views peacefully and without undue interference, while maintaining public order. Any enforcement measures should be undertaken in a manner that is proportionate, non-arbitrary, and consistent with the rule of law, with full adherence to due process guarantees.  In this context, it is important that the application of criminal sanctions, particularly those with broad or general scope, is carefully considered to ensure that it does not result in a disproportionate impact or inadvertently discourage the legitimate exercise of freedom of expression.

SUHAKAM also notes that the issues raised in the forum relate to matters of public concern that have previously attracted public attention, including SUHAKAM’s earlier call for an independent and transparent inquiry to uphold institutional integrity and public confidence. In such contexts, it is especially important that differing views can be expressed peacefully and that all parties are treated fairly and in accordance with the law.

SUHAKAM therefore calls on all relevant authorities to ensure that any enforcement measures arising from this incident are undertaken in a fair, measured, and proportionate manner, consistent with constitutional guarantees and international human rights standards. SUHAKAM remains committed to upholding both freedom of expression and public order, recognising that both are essential and mutually reinforcing pillars of a democratic society.

– END –

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

10 April 2026

KUALA LUMPUR (15 MARCH 2026) –  The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM), the All-Party Parliamentary Group Malaysia on Children’s Rights (APPGM-CR), and all the CSO working on children’s rights strongly condemn the recent use of the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA) by the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) to detain children who are victims of terrorist recruitment through social media and online gaming platforms.

There is growing international concern that terrorist groups are increasingly exploiting digital spaces and online gaming platforms to recruit and indoctrinate children. These tactics are evolving rapidly and often outpace the responses of governments. In such circumstances, the children involved are primarily victims of manipulation, grooming, and indoctrination, and should therefore be addressed through protection, rehabilitation, and psychosocial intervention, rather than restrictive security detention.

While we welcome the reported release of the children involved on the 13th of March 2026, it is essential that any further action prioritizes structured rehabilitation and monitoring mechanisms, particularly in cases where children may have been subjected to attempted online extremist recruitment. Detaining children under SOSMA, a law designed to address serious national security threats, is inconsistent with the principle of the best interests of the child and undermines Malaysia’s obligation to protect children from exploitation. The use of SOSMA against children raises serious concerns, as the procedural law does not provide child-specific safeguards, adequate judicial oversight, or protections consistent with the child justice system, particularly in cases involving national security offences.

As a State Party to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) since 1995, Malaysia has clear international obligations to ensure that children are protected from arbitrary or prolonged deprivation of liberty. The justice system must also ensure that children’s treatment prioritizes the best interests of the child, due process, and meaningful access to justice.

The Child Act 2001 provides a clear legal framework that prioritises the care, protection, rehabilitation and welfare of children exposed to harm, exploitation or criminal influence. Children who have been targeted by extremist networks should therefore be addressed through child protection mechanisms, including counselling, deradicalisation programmes, family support and community-based rehabilitation. Such interventions should incorporate appropriate psychosocial support, structured monitoring and active parental involvement to reduce the risk of recurrence. Deradicalisation initiatives must also be designed to include child-sensitive and age-appropriate modules that take into account the developmental needs, vulnerabilities and best interests of the child.

SUHAKAM and APPGM-CR therefore call upon the Prime Minister of Malaysia to:

1. Immediately impose a moratorium on the use of SOSMA against children;
2. Ensure that children involved in such cases are treated as victims of exploitation and provided appropriate rehabilitation and protection under the Child Act 2001; and
3. Repeal SOSMA or amend the procedural law to introduce judicial oversight and safeguards that prevent its application arbitrarily by the upcoming July Parliamentary sitting.

Malaysia must adopt a child-centered and rights-based approach in responding to emerging threats of online extremist recruitment. Protecting children from terrorist exploitation requires strong child protection systems, early intervention, and rehabilitation, not prolonged security detention.

SUHAKAM and APPGM-CR remain committed to working with the Government and the enforcement agencies to ensure that Malaysia’s counter-terrorism measures uphold human rights and protect the best interests of every child.

-END-

Issued jointly by:

Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM)
All-Party Parliamentary Group Malaysia Children’s Rights (APPGM-CR)

Endorsed by:

Initiative to Promote Tolerance & Prevent Violence (INITIATE.MY)
Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)
Prof. Emeritus Dato’ Noor Aziah Mohd Awal, SUHAKAM 1^st Children Commissioner
MANDIRI

KUALA LUMPUR (11 MARCH 2026) – In an era where digital narratives can either empower or endanger women and girls, ethical and responsible media practices are more critical than ever. Therefore, in conjunction with International Women’s Day 2026 on 8 March, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) and the Malaysian Media Council (MMM) jointly reaffirm our shared commitment to advancing gender equality, safeguarding human dignity, and strengthening ethical and responsible media practices in Malaysia.

International Women’s Day serves as a timely reminder that equality and non-discrimination must be reflected not only in law and policy, but also in public discourse. The media play a powerful role in shaping societal attitudes, influencing narratives, and reinforcing or challenging harmful stereotypes. As such, strengthening gender-responsive and rights-respecting media practices are essential to building a more inclusive and just society.

Following constructive engagement between both institutions, SUHAKAM and MMM have expressed their intention to strengthen dialogue and cooperation at the intersection of human rights and media governance. This engagement reflects the complementary roles of both institutions and shared recognition that ethical journalism and human rights protection are mutually reinforcing.

SUHAKAM, established under the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act 1999 (Act 597), is mandated to promote and protect human rights, including equality, dignity, and freedom of expression. MMM, established under the Media Council Act 2025 (Act 868), is an independent statutory body responsible for upholding ethical journalism, administering the Media Council Code of Conduct, managing complaints on unethical media practices, and strengthening public trust in the media. This engagement recognises the independence and statutory mandates of both institutions while encouraging dialogue in the public interest.

Areas of potential collaboration may include joint capacity-building initiatives, the possible development of training modules, and the exploration of a working group to consider media ethics through a gender lens.

In this regard, both institutions intend to explore ways to:

• Promote gender and child sensitive as well as ethical media standards;
• Encourage responsible reporting on issues affecting women, children and other vulnerable communities.
• Support safer working environments for journalists, particularly women journalists, and addressing harassment and intimidation in the course of reporting.
• Strengthen institutional dialogue on complaints, accountability, and governance; and
• Enhance awareness of the role of media in advancing equality and preventing harm.

These initiatives are broadly aligned with Malaysia’s commitments under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which underscore the importance of addressing harmful stereotyping, gender-based discrimination, and violence through preventive and educational approaches.

Recent trends in online harassment and gendered misinformation underscore the urgency of this initiative. As Malaysia navigates an evolving media landscape shaped by digital transformation, misinformation, and emerging technologies, media freedom must continue to be exercised with responsibility and respect for human dignity. Upholding ethical standards while safeguarding freedom of expression is fundamental to democratic accountability and public trust.

In commemorating International Women’s Day, SUHAKAM and MMM call upon media practitioners, editors, policymakers, and the public to collectively foster a media environment that promotes equality, fairness, and respect. Advancing women’s rights and strengthening ethical journalism are shared responsibilities that require sustained commitment towards rights, justice and action.

Melissa Akhir, SUHAKAM Commissioner, said:

“International Women’s Day reminds us of the importance of fostering a media environment that promotes equality, fairness, and respect. Advancing women’s rights and strengthening ethical journalism are shared responsibilities that require sustained commitment.”

Gayathry Venkiteswaran, MMM Board Member, said:

“The Malaysian Media Council is pleased to work with SUHAKAM on this very important initiative to strengthen gender equality and sensitivity in news coverage, as we recognise that ethical, fair, and inclusive reporting is essential to public trust and democratic discourse. Gender-sensitive reporting helps the public better understand the realities and contributions of all members of society, leading to more accurate journalism and more informed public debate. We at the Malaysian Media Council commit to advancing newsroom standards that both safeguard press freedom and protect women journalists from discrimination, harassment, and threats that undermine their ability to report freely and safely.”

Together, both SUHAKAM and MMM reaffirm that a gender-responsive, rights-aligned and accountable media ecosystem is fundamental to ensuring that all individuals, regardless of gender, can participate in public life with dignity, equality and safety.

-END-

Issued jointly by:

Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM)
Malaysian Media Council (MMM)

KUALA LUMPUR (8 MARCH 2026) – In conjunction with International Women’s Day observed this year under the theme “Rights. Justice. Action. For All Women and Girls.”, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) reaffirms its unwavering commitment to advancing and safeguarding gender equality and women’s rights, in line with international human rights standards, including the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).

This year’s theme serves as a timely reminder that human rights must be realised in the everyday lives of all women and girls. These include the right to equality before the law and access to justice; the freedom to express themselves and access information; the right to safety in both digital and public spaces; and the ability to participate fully in cultural, scientific and civic life. When these rights are denied or constrained by gendered power dynamics, structural inequalities are reinforced and public trust in institutions is undermined.

SUHAKAM’s external priorities are aligned with the CEDAW Concluding Observations on Malaysia, particularly the four thematic areas identified for Malaysia’s Follow-up Report to CEDAW Concluding Observations due in June, namely:

1. The enactment of comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation against women, including measures to strengthen women’s political leadership and to uphold the rights of women in detention.
2. The eradication of child marriage.
3. The issue of female genital mutilation (FGM); and
4. The protection of the human rights of refugee women and girls.

These priority areas reflect persistent gaps in law, policy and implementation that require urgent and coordinated national action. SUHAKAM will continue to monitor progress, engage relevant stakeholders and advocate for reforms consistent with Malaysia’s obligations under CEDAW, ensuring that commitments translate into tangible protection and equality for all women and girls.

Guided by the ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APF) Gender Strategy that informs the work of national human rights institutions, and pursuant to its broader human rights mandate, SUHAKAM remains committed to addressing gender inequality in substance, structures and culture. This includes monitoring systems affecting women’s access to justice, safeguarding freedom of expression, supporting gender-responsive laws and policies, and confronting discrimination and gender-based violence in all its forms. These efforts reflect SUHAKAM’s determination to mainstream gender equality both internally and externally, fully integrated across all human rights principles.

Through its proposed parliamentary engagement under the APF Gender Strategy follow-up, SUHAKAM underscores International Women’s Day as a critical opportunity to move from commitment to action. SUHAKAM urges all duty bearers, especially government institutions, Parliament and key stakeholders, to work collectively to ensure that human rights are effectively protected and enforced and translated into concrete justice and meaningful outcomes for women and girls throughout Malaysia.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

8 March 2026

KUALA LUMPUR (7 MARCH 2026) – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) expresses grave concern over the recent military attacks carried out by the United States and Israel against the Islamic Republic of Iran, which have significantly escalated tensions in the Middle East and placed civilian lives at grave risk.

Recent reports indicate that the strikes targeted multiple locations in Iran as part of a coordinated military operation, triggering retaliatory actions and raising fears of a wider regional conflict. The ongoing hostilities have already resulted in substantial casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure. 

SUHAKAM emphasises that any use of force that undermines the territorial integrity or political independence of a State is contrary to the fundamental principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter, in particular Article 2(4), and is inconsistent with the obligation of States to act in good faith as provided under Article 2(2). In this regard, SUHAKAM reiterates that all parties to an armed conflict are bound by international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law. These legal frameworks impose clear obligations on States and armed actors to always distinguish between civilians and combatants, to refrain from attacks on civilian infrastructure, and to ensure that any use of force complies with the principles of necessity, proportionality, and precaution.

SUHAKAM is particularly concerned by reports of civilian casualties and the risk of further harm to vulnerable populations, including women and children, as hostilities intensify. Armed conflict inevitably places civilians at the greatest risk, disrupts access to essential services, and exacerbates humanitarian suffering.

SUHAKAM therefore calls on all parties involved to:

1. Immediately cease actions that endanger civilian lives and civilian infrastructure;
2. Respect and comply fully with international humanitarian law, including the protection of civilians and civilian objects;
3. Exercise maximum restraint and prioritise diplomatic engagement to prevent further escalation of the conflict; and
4. Ensure accountability for violations of international law, including attacks that may constitute war crimes.

As for the international intervention, SUHAKAM calls for the following actions:

1. The UN Security Council may promptly adopt a resolution to stop and address the war between the United States and Israel with Iran, as it is contrary to international law and the UN Charter, particularly Articles 2(4) and 51;
2. If the United States prevents the Security Council from acting to restore international peace and security, the UN General Assembly may convene under the “Uniting for Peace” resolution to address and stop the war between the United States and Israel with Iran; and
3. The General Assembly may recommend that its Member States impose arms and trade embargoes on all the parties to armed conflict.

At a time of escalating global tensions, SUHAKAM stresses that lasting peace and security can only be achieved through dialogue, diplomacy and respect for international law. The international community must also play a constructive role in supporting de-escalation efforts and safeguarding the fundamental rights and dignity of all affected populations.

SUHAKAM stands in solidarity with all civilians affected by the conflict and reiterates that the protection of human life and human dignity must remain the foremost priority in any situation of armed conflict.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

7 March 2026

KUALA LUMPUR (28 FEBRUARY 2026) – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) views with serious concern recent remarks made by Members of Parliament which have denigrated certain groups of individuals through unfounded and scientifically unsubstantiated claims, including characterising persons of diverse sexual identity and sexual orientation as deviant cults and suggesting that work-related stress may contribute to an individual’s sexual identity or sexual orientation. SUHAKAM considers such statements to be inappropriate, misleading and unethical. The propagation of harmful stereotypes and misinformation risks deepening prejudice, normalising discrimination, and may ultimately expose affected individuals to stigma, harm and threats to their safety and wellbeing.

It is unbecoming of Members of Parliament representing the rakyat, or holders of important positions in the Cabinet, to continue to spew toxic language in the legislative house. Parliament must remain a forum of principled debate, guided by respect for human dignity and constitutional values. SUHAKAM emphasises that all individuals, regardless their sexual identity or sexual orientation, are entitled to be treated with dignity and respect.

Fundamental liberties are the cornerstone of Malaysia’s constitutional framework. Article 5 of the Federal Constitution provides for the right to personal liberty, whilst Article 8 guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the law. As lawmakers, Members of Parliament must adhere to Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, which upholds equality before the law. Article 8 clearly prohibits discrimination based on gender and this constitutional commitment is reinforced by Malaysia’s ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) in 1995. CEDAW and the Federal Constitution call for non-discrimination that recognises intersecting layers of oppression and vulnerability, rather than reducing individuals merely to facets of their identity, orientation, or background.

Public discourse, particularly within Parliament, must reflect this constitutional and international commitment to equality and dignity. SUHAKAM further emphasises that statements made by public officials, particularly in official forums such as Parliament, must be responsible, cautious, and grounded in accurate information, while reflecting respect for human rights principles. Statements that lack scientific clarity or that may promote prejudice can significantly shape negative public attitudes and contribute to a culture of discrimination.

SUHAKAM remains committed to promoting the understanding that human rights apply to all, in line with the spirit of the Federal Constitution and universal human rights principles. In this regard, SUHAKAM stands ready to conduct capacity-building initiatives with the Parliament of Malaysia on human rights principles and constitutional obligations, towards fostering a more informed and responsible lawmaking institution.

-END-

Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

28 February 2026