Posts in category: Press Statement

KUALA LUMPUR (2 AUGUST 2025) – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) warmly welcomes the designation of YBrs. Dr. Farah Nini binti Dusuki, a Human Rights Commissioner, as the Chief Children Commissioner until the completion of her three-year term as Commissioner on 8 March 2026.

SUHAKAM also warmly welcomes the appointments of Dr. Mohd Al Adib bin Samuri, Dr. Zufar Yadi Brendan bin Abdullah and Puan Melissa binti Mohd Akhir as Human Rights Commissioners, effective 28 June 2025. Dr. Mohd Al Adib bin Samuri and Dr. Zufar Yadi Brendan bin Abdullah are also simultaneously designated as Children Commissioners.

These appointments and designations by His Majesty Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the recommendations of the Prime Minister under section 5 and section 6A of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act 1999 [Act 597], reflect the Government’s ongoing commitment to strengthening the protection and promotion of children’s rights in Malaysia. SUHAKAM is confident that the experience, expertise, and unwavering dedication of the new Commissioners will enhance the Commission’s efforts to safeguard the rights and well-being of all children, including those who are undocumented and in conflict with the law.

Dr. Farah Nini Dusuki, appointed as a Commissioner on 8 March 2023, and administratively designated as a Children Commissioner, is an academic at the Faculty of Law, University of Malaya, with over 32 years of experience in child rights and human rights. She holds a PhD in child law from Cardiff University and has served as a consultant to various government agencies and NGOs. As a Children Commissioner, she has been actively involved in legal reforms, child complaint mechanisms, and raising public awareness on urgent child rights issues.

Dr. Mohd Al Adib Samuri, an academic at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, specialises in child rights within the Islamic legal framework. He earned his PhD in law focusing on children in conflict with the law and works closely with ministries, UNICEF, and civil society on issues like education rights, child marriage, and refugee children.

Dr. Zufar Yadi Brendan Abdullah brings 38 years of experience in social research, policy, and community development in Sarawak. A member of the Sarawak Social Development Council, he has led various volunteer initiatives on child rights and holds a PhD in Human Development from the United Kingdom.

Puan Melissa Mohd Akhir is a child rights expert with over 20 years of experience in law and protection across Southeast Asia. She holds a Master of Laws in International Children’s Rights from Leiden University and previously served as a Deputy Public Prosecutor at the Attorney General Chambers. She played a key role in drafting child protection legislation and now focuses on access to justice and parliamentary advocacy.

SUHAKAM hopes that these appointments and designations will support and enhance institutional responses to key child rights issues, particularly in ensuring access to quality education, robust child protection mechanisms, and a just and rehabilitative juvenile justice system.

We look forward to working collaboratively in building an inclusive and child-centred Malaysia in line with the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Child Act 2001. SUHAKAM remains steadfast in its commitment to ensuring that every child in Malaysia is protected, heard, and allowed to thrive.

-END-

The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

Date: 2 August 2025

KUALA LUMPUR (1 August 2025) – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) expresses deep concern over reports that a 14-year-old male student has been remanded 2-days for allegedly punching and threatening a schoolteacher after being reprimanded for skipping a physical education class.

SUHAKAM stands in solidarity with the teacher involved and reiterates that violence in any form is unacceptable. Every individual, whether teacher, student, or staff has the right to a safe and respectful environment in which to teach and learn.

However, SUHAKAM also strongly emphasises that children who come into conflict with the law must be treated in a manner that upholds their dignity, rights, and potential for rehabilitation, as guaranteed under the Child Act 2001 [Act 611] (‘Child Act’) and Malaysia’s international commitments, including the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (‘CRC’) adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 20 November 1989.

Whilst the nature of this case is serious, the student is protected under section 15 of the Child Act which prohibits the media from revealing any identifying details of a child involved in criminal or custody proceedings from media exposure or public condemnation. This provision reflects the spirit of Article 16 of the CRC which upholds every child’s right to privacy and protection from unlawful interference with their honour and reputation.  SUHAKAM reminds all media outlets and the public to respect the privacy of the child. Public identification, speculation, or vilification of minors is harmful and may breach this provision.

In light of this and similar incidents, SUHAKAM urgently calls on the Government of Malaysia to establish and implement a formal Diversion Policy for children in conflict with the law, in collaboration with stakeholders such as the police, welfare services, schools, and the judiciary.

A diversion mechanism allows children accused of minor or non-violent offences to be redirected away from the criminal justice system into community-based programmes focused on education, counselling, and behavioural support. This approach would not only reduce the risk of criminalisation and social stigma but also address underlying issues such as trauma, neglect, or mental health. Such a policy is not a denial of accountability, but a shift towards restorative and rehabilitative justice which is proven to be more effective and humane for children.

This incident should serve as a catalyst for reflection on broader systemic issues, prompting urgent consideration of whether schools have sufficient proactive and positive behavioural support systems, whether students have timely access to mental health services, and whether teachers are adequately equipped with conflict resolution and trauma-informed strategies. 

SUHAKAM therefore urges the Ministry of Education, school administrators, and relevant stakeholders to strengthen holistic, preventive support systems that prioritise the well-being of both students and educators.

Malaysia must move beyond punitive responses and embrace a child justice system that reflects compassion, equity, and the best interests of the child. SUHAKAM remains committed to working with the government and civil society to realise this vision.

-END-

Dr Farah Nini Dusuki
Children’s Commissioner
The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) 

Date: 1 August 2025

KUALA LUMPUR (30 JULY 2025) In conjunction with the World Day Against Trafficking in Persons, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) reaffirms its unwavering stance that no human being should ever be trafficked, exploited, or treated as a commodity. Human trafficking is a heinous crime and a fundamental violation of human rights, dignity, and freedom. SUHAKAM reaffirms its commitment to upholding the fundamental rights and dignity of all individuals, and to supporting national and international efforts to combat human trafficking in all its forms.

This year’s theme – “Campaign to highlight the vital role of law enforcement and the criminal justice system in dismantling organised trafficking networks while ensuring a victim-centred approach”- is timely and crucial. As trafficking networks become more complex and transnational, a coordinated, right-based, and victim-focused response is critical.

Human trafficking is a severe violation of human rights and dignity, and it undermines Malaysia’s constitutional values and international obligations.

This position is firmly rooted in Malaysia’s domestic and international legal commitments. Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia guarantees that “no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty save in accordance with the law”, whilst Article 6 of the same explicitly prohibits slavery and forced labour. These constitutional guarantees align with Malaysia’s obligations under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), including Article 4, which prohibits slavery and servitude, and Article 5, which affirms that “no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

Malaysia is also a State Party to key international instruments, including the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC) and its Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (Palermo Protocol), ratified in 2009. Whilst Malaysia’s recent elevation to Tier 2 in the United States Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report 2024 marks some progress, SUHAKAM would like to stress here that this should not lead to complacency. Every statistic represents a life of a person stripped of freedom and dignity.

SUHAKAM remains committed to working with our key stakeholders, including the Council for Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants (MAPO), enforcement agencies, and civil society organisations to:

1. Strengthen victim-centred protection and rehabilitation mechanisms.
2. Improve law enforcement responses and prosecution of trafficking cases.
3. Promote transparency in labour recruitment and dismantle exploitative syndicates.
4. Urge the institutionalisation of a robust framework to better protect the rights and welfare of migrant workers.
5. Accelerating the full implementation of the National Action Plan on Anti-Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP 3.0) 2021-2025.
6. Enhancing data collection and public reporting to support evidence-based policymaking and improve accountability.

Human trafficking can only be effectively addressed through a whole of government and whole of society cooperating. Every institution has a role to play, from enforcement and prosecution to rehabilitation and prevention. Crucially, responses must always uphold the dignity, rights and best interest of the victim.

As Malaysia moves forward in building a just and inclusive society, SUHAKAM will continue to speak up against all forms of human trafficking. No person, regardless of status, background or origin, should be treated as invisible. No one deserves to live in bondage.

Let us mark this day not only with words, but through sustained and meaningful action until the chains of exploitation are broken. Human dignity is non-negotiable. Freedom is a right, not a privilege.

-END-

The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

Date: 30 July 2025

KUALA LUMPUR (25 JULAI 2025) Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM) merakamkan setinggi-tinggi penghargaan kepada Kerajaan Malaysia, khususnya kepada YB Dato’ Sri Azalina Othman Said, Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri (Undang-undangdan Reformasi Institusi), atas komitmen berterusan beliau dalam memastikan pembentangan dan perbahasan LaporanTahunan SUHAKAM 2023 berjaya dilaksanakan di Dewan Rakyat pada 24 Julai 2025.

Ini merupakan satu langkah penting ke hadapan dalam memperkukuh mekanisme semak dan imbang institusi serta prinsip ketelusan dan kebertanggungjawaban dalam tadbir urus awam. Seramai 39 Ahli Parlimen telah mengambil bahagian dalam perbahasan ini, mengutarakan pelbagai isu penting berkaitan hak asasi manusia yang meliputi kerangka undang-undang, kebajikan, kesejahteraan sosial dan integriti institusi.

Antara isu utama yang diketengahkan termasuk:

i.     Kelewatan pelantikan Pengerusi dan Pesuruhjaya SUHAKAM, berserta cadangan untuk mempertingkat ketelussan dan keterangkuman dalam proses pemilihan.

ii.    Keadaan daif di lokap dan pusat tahanan, termasuk kematian dalam tahanan, kesesakan, perkhidmatan kesihatan yang tidak mencukupi serta penggunaan sistem ‘bucket’ yang masih digunakan di Papar dan Miri.

iii.   Pelaksanaan penahanan tanpa perbicaraan di bawah Akta Kesalahan Keselamatan (Langkah-Langkah Khas) 2012 (SOSMA), dengan gesaan supaya moratorium dilaksanakan dan penubuhan Mahkamah Khas bagi mempercepatkan proses keadilan.

iv.   Isu hak tanah Orang Asli/Asal, dengan penekanan kepada keperluan mendesak untuk mengiktiraf dan mewartakan tanah adat.

v.    Cabaran kewarganegaraan dan status tanpa kerakyatan, khususnya melibatkan kanak-kanak tidak berdokumen, serta keperluan untuk memperkenalkan unit pendaftaran bergerak oleh agensi kerajaan berkaitan.

vi.   Hak sosio-ekonomi kumpulan rentan termasuk pekerja gig dan e-hailing yang masih belum dilindungi secara menyeluruh di bawah kerangka undang-undang sedia ada.

vii. Diskriminasi kaum, agama dan xenofobia yang berleluasa, yang memerlukan usaha menyeluruh melalui pendidikan inklusif dan dasar kebangsaan.

viii.           Gesaan agar pelaksanaan syor SUHAKAM diperkukuh, termasuk cadangan untuk menubuhkanJawatankuasa Pilihan Khas Parlimen (PSC) bagi memantau tindakan susulan.

SUHAKAM menghargai maklum balas konstruktif dan komitmen daripada pelbagai kementerian serta agensi berkaitan terhadap isu-isu hak asasi manusia yang mendesak. Ini termasuk usaha memperbaiki akses kepada air bersih dan penjagaan kesihatan awam di kawasan pedalaman, memperluas Unit Kesihatan Dalam Tahanan (CHU) di pusat tahanan, mengintegrasikan pendidikan hak asasi manusiayang selaras dengan nilai Islam, serta memperkenalkan reformasi undang-undang dan dasar yang memberi manfaat kepada masyarakat Orang Asli, orang kurang upaya (OKU), dan pekerja ekonomi gig. SUHAKAM turut mengambil maklum sokongan berterusan Malaysia terhadap isu-isu kemanusiaan antarabangsa, terutamanya yang berkaitan dengan konflik di Palestin.

Laporan Tahunan 2023 menekankan tujuh bidang utama iaitu:

1. Hak kanak-kanak, wanita, warga emas, OKU dan komuniti Orang Asli/Asal.

2. Hak banduan dan penahanan yang adil.
3. Isu perkauman, diskriminasi berdasarkan agama dan kebencian.
4. Hak ekonomi, sosial dan kebudayaan (ESCR).
5. Perniagaan dan hak asasi manusia.
6. Reformasi undang-undang serta kerjasama serantau dan antarabangsa.
7. Reformasi institusi dalam SUHAKAM termasuk pendigitalan operasi.

SUHAKAM ingin merakamkan penghargaan khas kepada YB Senator Dato’ Setia Dr. Haji Mohd Naim bin Haji Mokhtar, Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri (Hal Ehwal Agama), atas komitmen dan sokongan beliau dalam memajukan wacana hak asasi manusia dalam kerangka Islam. Usaha beliau dalam mempromosikankefahaman inklusif dan penyelarasan antara maqasid syariah dan prinsip hak asasi sejagat amat dihargai.

SUHAKAM turut menyampaikan penghargaan istimewa kepada YB Tuan M. Kulasegaran A/L V. Murugeson, Timbalan Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri (Undang-undang dan Reformasi Institusi), atas peenggulungan perbahasan dan dedikasi beliau dalam memajukan agenda hak asasi manusia demi kesejahteraan rakyat Malaysia.

SUHAKAM menegaskan bahawa iltizam politik amat penting, bukan sekadar hanya dalam membentang dan membahas Laporan Tahunan, tetapi pelaksanaan tindakan susulan terhadap isu-isu yang dibangkitkan. Laporan ini berfungsi sebagai platform kepada Parlimen dan semua pihak berkepentingan untuk menyuarakan isu, berkongsi pandangan serta yang paling penting, mendorong tindakan segera oleh agensi kerajaan dalam melaksanakan cadangan SUHAKAM.

Hak asasi manusia pada asasnya berpaksikan maruah, kesaksamaan dan kebertanggungjawaban. SUHAKAM menegaskan bahawa Laporan Tahunan ini bukan sekadar satu keperluan prosedur, tetapi merupakan mekanisma kebertanggungjawaban yang penting dalam menilai kemajuan negara dalam menjunjung hak asasi manusia.

SUHAKAM mengalu-alukan kerjasama berterusan dengan Kerajaan, Ahli Parlimen, organisasi masyarakat sivil dan sektor swasta demi memastikan hak setiap individu di Malaysia dihormati, dilindungi dan dipenuhi.

Untuk maklumat lanjut dan membaca Laporan Tahunan SUHAKAM 2023 sepenuhnya, orang ramai dijemput melayari laman web rasmi SUHAKAM di: https://suhakam.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Laporan-Tahunan-2023-SUHAKAM.pdf

-TAMAT-

Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia(SUHAKAM)

Tarikh: 25 Julai 2025

KUALA LUMPUR (25 JULY 2025) – SUHAKAM expresses deep concern over the recent spate of bullying cases reported in schools across the country, calling it a ““systemic crisis of child safety” that requires immediate intervention nationwide. The Children’s Commissioner (CC) of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM), Dr Farah Nini Dusuki, emphasises that school must be the safest place for every child. But recent cases paint a worrying picture of fear, isolation, and violence. These disturbing incidents underscore the urgent need for comprehensive and sustained action to ensure that schools remain safe and nurturing environments for all children.

In just the past week, three serious bullying cases have been reported:

1. On 18 July 2025, a Form 1 female student in Sabah was reported to have jumped from the third floor of her school building, allegedly due to bullying by her peers.
2. On 20 July 2025, in Sungai Petani, Kedah, another Form 1 female student was found tied up in a school toilet. Two 13-year-old students were detained to assist in the investigation.
3. Most recently, on 22 July 2025, a Form 3 male student sustained serious eye injuries after being punched by fellow students.

The Office of the Children’s Commissioner (OCC) has contacted the Ministry of Education (MOE) to verify whether these cases were being monitored by the relevant authorities. The OCC was informed that the MOE is aware of the incidents and is taking steps to enhance intervention programmes to address bullying at a nationwide level.

While the CC welcomes these efforts, the CC urges the MOE to take more concrete and immediate action. In reviewing the MOE’s Guidelines for Handling Bullying in Schools (launched in 2023), the CC notes provisions requiring engagement between the parents of the bully and the victim. However, the CC questions whether such engagements are being carried out effectively and consistently, and whether proper follow-up is being conducted to ensure accountability and behavioural change.

Furthermore, the Guidelines stipulate the appointment of an investigative teacher for reported cases. The CC raises concerns about whether these teachers are adequately trained to carry out such responsibilities, and whether the current system includes any mechanism for monitoring or oversight. Where bullying has been reported, schools must proactively conduct regular monitoring, especially in high-risk areas such as dormitories, assembly halls, and prefect rooms.

The CC believes that the current mechanisms in place are insufficient. The growing number of cases reflects systemic gaps. According to the MOE’s Sistem Sahsiah Diri Murid, reported school bullying incidents increased from 3,887 cases in 2022 to 5,891 cases in 2023. By October 2024, the figure had already reached 5,703 cases, involving a total of 11,594 students.

The CC calls for urgent and coordinated action from all stakeholders, particularly the MOE. Schools must prioritise student safety and ensure all complaints of bullying are addressed promptly and effectively. At the same time, parents have a critical role in identifying signs of bullying and reporting such incidents to both the school and the authorities. Parents must reject the outdated notion that bullying is a “rite of passage” to build resilience and instead cultivate open and supportive communication with their children.

The CC reiterates that every child has the right to feel safe at school. It is the collective duty of educators, parents, authorities, and the wider community to ensure that this right is fully upheld.

-END-

Dr Farah Nini Dusuki
Children’s Commissioner
The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) 

Date: 25 July 2025

KUALA LUMPUR (23 JUN 2025) – Pesuruhjaya Kanak-Kanak (PK) Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM), memandang serius penyebaran kandungan melibatkan kanak-kanak perempuan oleh sebuah laman Facebook bertajuk ‘Grup Budak-budak Sekolah Rendah’, yang kemudiannya mencetuskan komen-komen berunsur seksual dan lucah oleh pengguna media sosial. Tindakan tersebut bukan sahaja tidak bermoral, tetapi boleh disifatkan sebagai satu bentuk eksploitasi kanak-kanak di ruang digital.

PK memuji tindakan pempengaruh media sosial, Wee Yun Nee atau Mekyun, yang telah membuat laporan polis bagi menuntut siasatan terhadap komen-komen yang menjijikkan dan berunsur gangguan seksual terhadap kanak-kanak. Tindakan ini wajar dijadikan contoh tanggungjawab sivik dalam menangani jenayah seksual dalam talian.

PK ingin menegaskan bahawa kanak-kanak berhak untuk hidup dan berkembang dalam persekitaran yang selamat, termasuk di alam maya. Sebagaimana termaktub dalam Konvensyen Mengenai Hak Kanak-Kanak Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu (UNCRC), khususnya Artikel 34, negara wajib melindungi kanak-kanak daripada semua bentuk eksploitasi seksual dan penderaan seksual. Ini termasuk langkah-langkah yang sewajarnya untuk mencegah seorang kanak-kanak untuk mengambil bahagian atau diperguna secara paksa dalam sebarang aktiviti seksual, mengeksploitasi kanak-kanak untuk pelacuran atau amalan seksual lain, serta eksploitasi kanak-kanak dalam bahan lucah atau pornografi. Malaysia sebagai parti kepada UNCRC mempunyai obligasi moral dan undang-undang untuk memastikan bahawa sebarang bentuk eksploitasi seksual terhadap kanak-kanak, termasuk di alam maya, dicegah dan ditangani secara tegas.

Pendedahan kanak-kanak kepada kandungan atau komen yang menjurus kepada seksualisasi adalah pelanggaran serius terhadap hak asasi mereka, dan boleh disiasat di bawah:

•           Seksyen 10, Akta Kesalahan-Kesalahan Seksual Terhadap Kanak-Kanak 2017, berkenaan mengakses bahan penganiayaan seksual kanak-kanak, yang mana pelaku boleh dipenjarakan selama tempoh tidak melebihi lima tahun atau didenda tidak melebihi sepuluh ribu ringgit atau kedua-duanya;

•           Seksyen 211, Akta Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia 1998, berkaitan larangan terhadap pemberian kandungan jelik, yang mana pelaku boleh didenda tidak melebihi lima puluh ribu ringgit atau dipenjarakan selama tempoh tidak melebihi satu tahun atau kedua-duanya sekali; dan

•           Seksyen 292, Kanun Keseksaan, bagi kesalahan penyebaran kandungan lucah, yang mana pelaku boleh dihukum dengan pemenjaraan selama tempoh yang boleh sampai tiga tahun atau dengan denda atau dengan kedua-duanya sekali.

Oleh itu, PK menggesa Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) untuk menjalankan siasatan terperinci terhadap semua pihak yang terbabit, termasuk pentadbir laman Facebook tersebut dan pengguna yang telah memberikan komen-komen bersifat gangguan seksual terhadap kanak-kanak.

PK turut menyeru Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia (SKMM) untuk bertindak lebih tegas dan proaktif dalam memantau, menyekat serta mengambil tindakan ke atas akaun dan kandungan yang menyumbang kepada budaya seksualisasi kanak-kanak. SKKM juga hendaklah menguatkuasakan Akta Keselamatan Dalam Talian 2025 terhadap pemberi perkhidmatan aplikasi, dalam kes ini, iaitu, Facebook (“Pemberi Perkhidmatan”), supaya Pemberi Perkhidmatan mewujudkan mekanisme untuk melindungi keselamatan dalam talian pengguna kanak-kanak supaya apa-apa kandungan berupa bahan penganiayaan seksual kanak-kanak tidak dapat diakses oleh penggunanya.

Akhir sekali, PK CC mengingatkan bahawa perlindungan terhadap kanak-kanak termasuk di alam maya merupakan suatu tanggungjawab kolektif. Ibu bapa, pendidik, pengendali platform digital, pembuat dasar dan masyarakat keseluruhan perlu berganding bahu memastikan ruang digital negara ini bebas daripada eksploitasi, gangguan, dan penyalahgunaan terhadap kanak-kanak. Semua pihak digesa untuk lebih peka dan bertindak segera apabila berhadapan dengan kandungan yang mencurigakan atau berpotensi menjatuhkan maruah kanak-kanak.

-TAMAT-

Dr Farah Nini Dusuki

Pesuruhjaya Kanak Kanak

23 JUN 2025

KUALA LUMPUR (18 JUNE 2025) The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) remains deeply concerned over the unresolved issues surrounding the death of Teoh Beng Hock, who died while in the custody of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) on 16 July 2009. In particular, the Attorney General’s decision to classify the case as “NFA” (“No further Action”). 

Teoh was found dead on July 16 2009 after falling from the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam, after being questioned overnight for several hours by officers at the Selangor Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission headquarters.

Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution guarantees that “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty save in accordance with the law.” This constitutional provision enshrines the fundamental right to life and liberty and obliges the State and its agencies to ensure that this right is always protected, particularly, when an individual is under the care or custody of the State.

In 2014, the Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the Coroner’s Court’s open verdict, concluding that Teoh Beng Hock’s death was not due to suicide. The judgment clearly stated that “a person or persons were responsible for his death.”  However, and unfortunately, despite the Court of Appeals clear ruling over a decade ago, no known criminal prosecution or disciplinary action has taken place, highlighting a serious gap in enforcement and institutional accountability. 

More than 16 years after the tragic incident, justice for Teoh Beng Hock and his family remains elusive. SUHAKAM reiterates that the right to life under Article 5 not only protects individuals from arbitrary deprivation of life but also imposes a positive obligation on the State to investigate all custodial deaths thoroughly, independently, and effectively and to hold perpetrators accountable. Failure to do so constitutes a violation of both domestic constitutional obligations and Malaysia’s international human rights commitments. 

SUHAKAM stands in solidarity with the family of Teoh Beng Hock and other parties who are demanding accountability and transparency. We earnestly call upon the AGC and PDRM to review their “NFA” decision and to take the necessary criminal proceedings against the officers responsible for Teoh Beng Hock’s death. In the event that the AGC and PDRM were still to insist that this is a case for NFA, then, good governance mandates that they must be transparent and must disclose the full details of the police investigation and explain why the MACC officers implicated in the case have not been held accountable. Teoh Beng Hock’s tragic and untimely death remains a stark reminder of the critical need to uphold human rights, the rule of law, and institutional accountability in Malaysia.

In this regard, SUHAKAM recalls the Méndez Principles on Effective Interviewing for Investigations and Information Gathering, which emphasise non-coercive, science-based, and rights-compliant methods of questioning. The Mendez Principles reject the use of intimidation or coercion during interrogations and stress the importance of procedural safeguards, such as access to legal counsel, the right to remain silent, and audio-visual recording of interviews. Adopting these standards is essential to prevent abuses and ensure the dignity and safety of all individuals in custody.

SUHAKAM strongly urges the Government to take the long-overdue step of acceding to the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT), as a clear manifestation of Malaysia’s commitment to ending torture, upholding human dignity, and strengthening institutional integrity.

-END-

The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

Date: 18 JUNE 2025

KUALA LUMPUR (13 JUNE 2025) – The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) views with grave concern the recent incident involving the imposition of a travel ban on activist Fahmi Reza. The imposition was without prior notice, legal basis or adequate justification. Such action constitutes a violation of his constitutional right to freedom of movement as enshrined in Article 9 of the Federal Constitution and raises serious questions about compliance with due process and the principles of natural justice. The absence of clear legal procedures and transparency in the enforcement of travel restrictions represents a significant encroachment upon civil liberties and sets a troubling precedent for arbitrary state action. 

Although both the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) and the Director-General of Immigration have since clarified that there was no official international travel restriction imposed on Fahmi Reza, the fact that he was barred from leaving the country highlights serious flaws in the communication mechanism between these two enforcement agencies. It is unsettling that until today neither of these Departments has publicly apologised to Fahmi Reza. 

This incident reflects the pressing need for improved coordination among enforcement agencies, particularly between the police and immigration departments. The lack in clarity of communication between these agencies often results in miscommunication, confusion and injustice. SUHAKAM recommends the establishment of a clear, streamlined information-sharing protocol to enable timely and transparent decisions that uphold the constitutional and legal rights of individuals. The law must never be arbitrary or oppressive in nature.

However, a more important concern is that the imposition of travel bans without due process contravenes the right to freedom of movement, a human and fundamental right firmly protected under both our Federal Constitution and international law. 

Bearing in mind Fahmi Reza’s activities as a cartoonist and satirist, this brings us to another crucial issue. Article 10 guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression. As a cartoonist and satirist, Fahmi Reza has been a human rights activist exercising his political views through artistic expressions as well as through satirical form of expressions. Such activities are protected by the Constitution and must be respected in a democratic society that upholds the Rule of Law. 

Article 13(2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights affirms that “Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own and to return to his country”. Travel restrictions must therefore be imposed proportionately within a constitutional and legal framework and individuals subjected to such bans must be promptly informed, given the opportunity to challenge the decision and provided access to an independent review mechanism.  Travel restrictions that are seemingly linked to his political expressions may therefore constitute an unlawful limitation of his constitutional and human rights.

Fahmi Reza’s unfortunate incident must serve as a critical reminder of the importance of respecting and safeguarding fundamental liberties through clear procedures, accountable governance, and a steadfast commitment to human dignity. Such incident is not in consonance with good governance.

-END-

The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)
Date: 13 June 2025

KUALA LUMPUR (4 JUNE 2025) – On 13th May 2025, the family of the late J. Soosaimanicckam submitted a memorandum to the Attorney General Chambers (AGC), urging the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) to investigate into the death of the late J. Soosaimanicckam. The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) expresses deep concern over the prolonged delay in the pursuit of justice for the late naval cadet J. Soosaimanicckam, who tragically lost his life during a training session in 2017.  In July 2024, the Ipoh High Court classified his death as homicide. The High Court had ruled that the death was a result of navy officers denying him medical treatment for leptospirosis. In the light of the High Court ruling, it is imperative that the PDRM expedites its investigation and ensures those responsible are held accountable under the law.

19th May 2025 commemorates seven years since the passing of the late J. Soosaimanicckam. The fact that seven years have passed without resolution is a serious indictment of the justice system’s ability to protect the rights of victims and their families against criminal wrongdoings. Justice delayed is denied justice. In this case, prolonged inaction undermines public trust in state institutions, particularly, law enforcement agencies.

As mandated by its role, SUHAKAM had been holding watching briefs in this case, and has been actively monitoring the case since 2018. Whilst we recognize the complexity of cases involving state actors, SUHAKAM stresses that no institution should be immune from scrutiny when there is credible evidence of rights violations.

This case is not only a matter of justice for one family but a testament to the broader principles enshrined in the Federal Constitution. Article 5(1) guarantees that “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty save in accordance with law”. The tragic and preventable death of J. Soosaimanicckam, coupled with institutional inaction, amounts to a failure to uphold this fundamental right.

The case also implicates international human rights standards, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Article 3 of the UDHR guarantees the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 8 of the same ensures that everyone has the right to an effective remedy by competent national tribunals for acts violating fundamental rights granted by the constitution or by law. The prolonged delay in investigation contravenes these human rights principles.

SUHAKAM urges the PDRM and the AGC to act with urgency, impartiality, and transparency. The family of the late J. Soosaimanicckam deserves justice and closure, and the public deserves assurance that all deaths in custody or under state supervision are properly investigated and those responsible are held accountable.

SUHAKAM further calls for a clear timeline for the investigation and prosecution processes. There must be regular updates to be communicated to the family, and independent oversight to ensure the integrity of the investigation. SUHAKAM remains committed to upholding justice, transparency, and human rights and will continue to monitor the developments of this case closely.

-END-

The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

Date: 4 June 2025

KUALA LUMPUR (23 MAY 2025) – Pursuant to its powers under the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act 1999 (Act 597), the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) will be conducting a public inquiry into the alleged human rights violations in connection with the incident of 17 January 2025 at Taiping Prison, Perak, which led to the death of an inmate who was in custody.

The inquiry will verify, among others, whether there were any human rights violations in connection with the incident, and, if so, –

(i)         to identify the nature and extent of such violations.

(ii)        to examine how and why such violations occurred.

(iii)       to determine the parties responsible for the violations; and

(iv)       to make recommendations to prevent the recurrence of similar incidents.

The Inquiry Panel will comprise the following members:

(i)         Dato’ Seri Hishamudin Yunus – Chairman of SUHAKAM, as Chairperson of the Panel.

(ii)        Datuk Mariati Robert – SUHAKAM Commissioner; and

(iii)       Dr Farah Nini Dusuki – SUHAKAM Commissioner

The public hearings will be held at the Pusat Koreksional Kamunting (KEMTA), Kamunting, Perak, and are scheduled to proceed in two phases: from 9 to 12 June 2025 and from 23 to 26 June 2025. If the need arises, additional subsequent dates will be announced at a later stage.

Members of the public and media who wish to attend the proceedings are welcome but are required to pre-register at the following QR Code:

For media inquiries, please contact Ms. Norashikin Hamzah, Media and Promotion Division at shikin@suhakam.org.my or 019-6215336 or Mr. Safrizaman Mohammad at safrizaman@suhakam.org.my.

-END-

The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM)

Date: 23 MAY 2025